We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Energy Privitisation Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2283
Description[?]:
We propose to privitise the national energy company, and allow private contractors to purchase control of energy production and distribution, with the intention of allowing the free market to bring about an increase in efficiency, and a decrease in prices. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on energy generation.
Old value:: All power stations are publicly owned.
Current: Small scale private electrical generation is permitted but most energy is generated by a government-owned company.
Proposed: Private power stations provide energy for the entire power grid.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on the nation's power grid.
Old value:: The national grid is fully owned by the state.
Current: Multiple private companies each own and maintain sections of the national power grid.
Proposed: Multiple private companies each own and maintain sections of the national power grid.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by nationalised companies.
Current: Energy provision is left to local governments.
Proposed: Energy is provided by private companies which are not subject to any special regulations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:43:22, September 08, 2006 CET | From | Lotus Coalition of the Endless Knot | To | Debating the Energy Privitisation Bill |
Message | "This bill goes against the decision made in the AMZC/CD Compromise Deal and as such neither of our parties shall vote in favour of this." -- Director General Suzanna Kukai |
Date | 16:50:15, September 08, 2006 CET | From | Christian Democrats | To | Debating the Energy Privitisation Bill |
Message | "The energy situation in Keymon is settled law. It is one of the only regulatory laws we support and for good reason - the PNRF drafted a fantastic bit of legislation to get the energy nationalization passed, and it was one of the more well thought out, well written laws in our nation's history. Like the Church of Keymon and our neutrality, energy production is settled law." -- Alice Watterson |
Date | 01:25:32, September 09, 2006 CET | From | Democratic Industrialists | To | Debating the Energy Privitisation Bill |
Message | "We support any efforts to overthrow our current communist government." --Wilson Simmons |
Date | 11:33:05, September 11, 2006 CET | From | National Party | To | Debating the Energy Privitisation Bill |
Message | "It is the nonsense consensus theory espoused by the Christian Democrats that we are hoping to consign to the past" --Sylvia Van Devanter |
Date | 16:05:15, September 11, 2006 CET | From | Christian Democrats | To | Debating the Energy Privitisation Bill |
Message | "This is not theory. It is fact, backed up by a century of legislation. For the better part of the past century, several parts of Keymon law have been settled and simply aren't up for debate. We say the same thing to new communist parties too, Ms Devanter, when they try to radicalize Keymon or act horrified at our morality." -- Kyle Douglas |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 24 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 74 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 19 |
Random fact: When your party holds the foreign affairs department, you can create new treaties. However, before writing anything new, it is a good idea to search for existing treaties which already accomplish what you desire. |
Random quote: "I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality.... I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word." - Martin Luther King, Jr. |