Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 03:11:34
Server time: 00:48:25, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Civil Marriages Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Partisans And Artisans League

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2082

Description[?]:

This bill is a follow up to the bill "One man, one woman, one marriage, one Beluzia!" in which I forgot to include a proposal. The description is the same in this instance.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:44:12, July 03, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Civil Marriages Act
MessageWhatabout a man and 2 women? Or three women?

Date02:43:22, July 06, 2005 CET
FromFree Beluzians
ToDebating the Civil Marriages Act
MessageThe FBP feels that this should not be a matter for the national government. Each province has differing views towards marriage, and forcing them to accept a single view would be to ostracize (Spelling error, I know) them from the national community.

Date18:34:43, July 11, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Civil Marriages Act
MessageHot virgins should never be ostracized from the Peoples bedrooms!

Date19:54:26, July 12, 2005 CET
FromSocial-Liberal Party
ToDebating the Civil Marriages Act
MessageThe SLP feels the government should recognise homosexual marriage, and thus opposes this bill.

Date23:41:59, July 12, 2005 CET
FromPartisans And Artisans League
ToDebating the Civil Marriages Act
MessageGood for you SLP! I hope you have a long and fruitful life in politics.

Date21:35:41, July 14, 2005 CET
FromSocial-Liberal Party
ToDebating the Civil Marriages Act
MessageUhm, thanks? *peers*

Date00:20:48, July 15, 2005 CET
FromPartisans And Artisans League
ToDebating the Civil Marriages Act
MessageNo, no, no I really mean it. After the LCP left I didn't have anyone to argue with, but now...... ;-)

Date03:00:08, July 15, 2005 CET
FromSocial-Liberal Party
ToDebating the Civil Marriages Act
MessageLet the culture wars begin?

Date15:01:57, July 16, 2005 CET
FromPartisans And Artisans League
ToDebating the Civil Marriages Act
MessageYes let them because in disagreeing with others you both increase your own strength of belief as well as become more tolerant and understanding of others.

Date01:34:51, July 19, 2005 CET
FromSocial-Liberal Party
ToDebating the Civil Marriages Act
Message(*sincerely doubts the latter, OOCly*)

Date04:33:23, July 19, 2005 CET
FromBeluzian Labor Party
ToDebating the Civil Marriages Act
MessageLabor believes that this issue is, to some extent, a diversion from serious policy debate.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 90

no
    

Total Seats: 146

abstain
  

Total Seats: 38


Random fact: Particracy is set in the fictional world of Terra, which mirrors the real world of today and yet is not quite like it.

Random quote: "There is a mandate to impose a voluntary return to traditional values." - Ronald Reagan

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72