We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: A Cure for Kundrati Sniffles, Part I
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alderdath Rabrati Konciralati Erradikati
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2320
Description[?]:
| Kundrati needs a better health policy. We seek these changes to better the nation. We are amenable to splits, and on this bill we would be extremely surprised if none were requested. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Health and safety legislation for industry.
Old value:: There are no set health and safety regulations for industry.
Current: The government introduces and actively regulates health and safety legislation in all areas of industry.
Proposed: Health and safety laws are to be determined by local governments.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The use of cannabis for medicinal purposes.
Old value:: Cannabis is legal as a sedative for patients in pain.
Current: Cannabis is legal as a sedative for patients in pain.
Proposed: The legality of medicinal cannabis is established by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 06:20:52, November 24, 2006 CET | From | Demkratteja Lebraleiju Kundratatka | To | Debating the A Cure for Kundrati Sniffles, Part I |
| Message | KLD has already got article 13 imposed and whole hartedly support it, it is called the Palmerston Notion 2319, named after the person who suggested it Lord Palmerston (KLD Health spokesperson) It is good to know that you and I thought up the same legislation, as I would know that I would have some support in passing the legislation in the senate, and probably other bills KLD Support Article 13 Article 12 Article 11 Article 8 Article 3 Article 2 Article 1 These are great articles, and i hope they pass for the better of the citizens of Kundrati Union. And We Do not support Article 9 Article 7 As you know the KLD position regarding regulation, we see that it is necessary for the Government to regulate these areas. We would rather that OH&S policies are left up to the Federal Government level, so all OH&S legislation Is uniform across the board as it one prefecture could have legislation stating that fire exits are not necessary, and another could have wearing hard hats in construction site not compulsory, I can see the legal damages that companies could face, as well as the hardship by the workers not to have the right to work in a safe working environment. Article 5 We believe that the citizens of Kundrati have the right to know whether or not they are eating GM food products, plus it gives people the chance to choose from a variety of foods Article 6 Article 4 What is the use of creating a legislation but not enforcing the powers of the legislation, it seems like this could create Bureaucratic red tape and seem like a legislation just to look good. |
| Date | 08:15:30, November 24, 2006 CET | From | Askaleja Sekekeiju Kundratatka | To | Debating the A Cure for Kundrati Sniffles, Part I |
| Message | I'd wholeheartedly object to most of these, especially 1-3. One gripe, generally, is that consumers should know in it's entirety the reality of what they are eating and digesting. |
| Date | 11:01:20, November 24, 2006 CET | From | Alderdath Profikaki Farsisi Malfikek | To | Debating the A Cure for Kundrati Sniffles, Part I |
| Message | we support articles 4,5,6 and 7. But if they are presented as part of the bill in its current form we shall vote no, as we object to the other articles in place. |
| Date | 13:39:37, November 26, 2006 CET | From | Demkratteja Lebraleiju Kundratatka | To | Debating the A Cure for Kundrati Sniffles, Part I |
| Message | We believe that these laws cannot be enforced by Local Governments |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 183 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 102 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 16 |
| Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
| Random quote: "I think it's about time we voted for senators with breasts. After all, we've been voting for boobs long enough." - Clarie Sargent |