We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: police weapons
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian party of Darnussia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2077
Description[?]:
| Percentage Choice 46.77% Police officers carry military-grade equipment. 21.34% Police officers carry standard firearms. 31.90% Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons. see here! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons.
Current: Police officers carry military-grade equipment.
Proposed: Police officers carry military-grade equipment.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:43:11, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the police weapons |
| Message | we know the debate by now so i'll just pass on this bill knowing that the people back me up :P |
| Date | 14:38:44, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the police weapons |
| Message | Nope, not going to happen. The people voted for the parties that banned it, CoL, SEP, and myself all had an increase in votes. |
| Date | 15:59:10, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the police weapons |
| Message | that was for other issue's... |
| Date | 16:01:03, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the police weapons |
| Message | and i also got an increase in votes last elections |
| Date | 16:32:13, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the police weapons |
| Message | Those polls are only a random way to decide what policy to take on a bill if you are confused. |
| Date | 16:32:39, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the police weapons |
| Message | They were made at random on a computer |
| Date | 17:03:13, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the police weapons |
| Message | The Poll informantion being used if out of date, it is taken from an article published in "The Global Gazette" from January 2075. An opinion poll that was before the election and is over an year old, were has the Communist Party been until now using this poll? Surely this shows the Communist Party to be completly desperate, that they result to an opinion poll that was taken over a year ago, before the last elections. http://aiglesrv.no-ip.info:8080/particracy/main/viewnews.php?newsid=2678 |
| Date | 21:27:15, July 06, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the police weapons |
| Message | The poll is 9 months old. A little reality check tells you that not a significant amount of people change their opinions dramatically in 9 months. Be sensible. Stop looking so pathetic and clueless. |
| Date | 00:16:44, July 07, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the police weapons |
| Message | I guess you do a good enough job at the LBSC |
| Date | 03:18:39, July 07, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the police weapons |
| Message | Yes! We do! Now leave us alone over here in the centrist world! |
| Date | 13:06:01, July 07, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the police weapons |
| Message | SEP: can't you roll-play! and it's not random by the way they actually look at the green barometers... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 229 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 372 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 149 |
| Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda. |
| Random quote: "If men want to oppose war, it is statism that they must oppose." - Ayn Rand |