Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5476
Next month in: 03:14:07
Server time: 16:45:52, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): burgerboys | LC73DunMHP | NL | Ost | Paulo Nogueira | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 2329

Details

Submitted by[?]: Federal Progressive Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2329

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:24:39, December 14, 2006 CET
From Valruzian National Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2329
MessageIt is truly a shame that Jacob Arbenz did not live to see this day. Rest assured, you would have his support, my friends.

Date11:18:12, December 15, 2006 CET
From True Valruzians
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2329
MessageWe congratulate the left on finding enough parties to defeat us, it has only taken forty years.

Date13:37:07, December 15, 2006 CET
From Valruzian National Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2329
MessageAh how typical, a socialist failure as one party abstains. :)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 92

no
   

Total Seats: 95

abstain
 

Total Seats: 14


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Antonin Scalia

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69