We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Co-operation for Sport Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: People's Progressive Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2080
Description[?]:
| This bill will allow government to fund sports clubs whilst allowing private sports clubs to function. We recognise that, although they may conflict in some areas, private sports companies and government can go hand in hand to create a healthier, sportier Darnussia. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The funding of sports clubs.
Old value:: The government does not fund sports clubs; only private ones are allowed.
Current: The government does not fund sports clubs; only private ones are allowed.
Proposed: The government funds some sports clubs side-by-side with private ones.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:46:07, July 11, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Co-operation for Sport Bill |
| Message | See what you think, this is a compromise between the bill to only have state run sports clubs, which could be excessively costly, and just private clubs, which we have at the moment. Surely business and government dont need to compete or monopolise this, and can work together in sports? |
| Date | 15:49:05, July 11, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Co-operation for Sport Bill |
| Message | See what you think, this is a compromise between the bill to only have state run sports clubs, which could be excessively costly, and just private clubs, which we have at the moment. Surely business and government dont need to compete or monopolise this, and can work together in sports? |
| Date | 16:10:27, July 11, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Co-operation for Sport Bill |
| Message | A comprimise that might have been reached during the debate of the bill, I proposed, however, if the sport club is free, or extremely cheap and everyone and anyone can become a member, with good quaility facilities, then I guess it is ok |
| Date | 16:26:24, July 11, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Co-operation for Sport Bill |
| Message | Because the clubs will be supported side by side by government, then the clubs will be very cheap. |
| Date | 07:28:36, July 12, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Co-operation for Sport Bill |
| Message | And I mean, c;mon...they're sports clubs. What kinda hobo plays baseball every weekend? : D |
| Date | 21:40:54, July 12, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Co-operation for Sport Bill |
| Message | Well, seeing as there were few objections, might as well try and get it passed! |
| Date | 21:46:21, July 12, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Co-operation for Sport Bill |
| Message | Argh, too many sports bills! THEY ARE JUST SPORTS CLUBS! NOT SOCIAL SECURITY! |
| Date | 18:08:06, July 13, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Co-operation for Sport Bill |
| Message | I hope other parties vote yes, there's only two seats in it! Or, please switch to yes! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 302 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 304 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 144 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America). |
| Random quote: "It is double pleasure to deceive the deceiver." - Niccolo Machiavelli |