Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5471
Next month in: 02:16:48
Server time: 21:43:11, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): ameerali | hyraemous | Interstellar. | Jimmy_G_3 | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cleaner Energy Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: AM Populist Social Democrats

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2331

Description[?]:

Whereas, We need to become less dependent on fossil fuels, which eventually will run out, and

Whereas, there are currently no subsidies for alternative forms of energy,

We hereby propose to subsidize both renewable and nuclear power.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:38:50, December 18, 2006 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Cleaner Energy Act
MessageWhile we are generally against government intervention in the marketplace, we may decide to be flexible on this issue due to the benefits of increased energy production.

Date18:27:31, December 18, 2006 CET
FromUnited Democratic Labour Party
ToDebating the Cleaner Energy Act
MessageWe are opposed to nuclear power as it leaves a legacy of waste that future generations millions of years down the line will still be dealing with, however without article 2 there wont be any future generations so we support this bill

Date22:49:20, December 18, 2006 CET
FromAM Populist Social Democrats
ToDebating the Cleaner Energy Act
MessageA reason to support nuclear power is that evern though on Terra, we cannot presume the same global warming problems that exist on Earth, even if there is none on Terra at the moment, fossil fuel overuse would eventually create such a problem.

We are better burdening future generations with nuclear waste than with a planet unihabitable.

If the UDLP is saying that it would be ideal if all energy could be renewable, we would agree. However, if their position is that nuclear power is not superior to fossil fuels, we would disagree.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 288

no
 

Total Seats: 39

abstain
 

Total Seats: 24


Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated.

Random quote: "In politics, stupidity is not a handicap." - Napoleon Bonaparte

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59