We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Economics Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Vuloch Ca Korzia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2081
Description[?]:
| Another re-hash of old arguments. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right to gamble.
Old value:: The legality of gambling is a matter of local governments.
Current: Gambling is legal across the nation, no regulation whatsoever.
Proposed: Only small-scale gambling is allowed, involving limited amounts of money; casinos are illegal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on industry and subsidies to industrial operations.
Old value:: Certain industries are owned by the state, all others are under private ownership.
Current: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services.
Proposed: The state owns the commanding heights of the economy and all major industries, but private ownership is allowed in the minor industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:13:43, July 13, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Economics Bill |
| Message | No |
| Date | 18:14:14, July 13, 2005 CET | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the Economics Bill |
| Message | Oops, wrong gambling proposal. |
| Date | 21:30:10, July 13, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Economics Bill |
| Message | SDP: Voting yes on a bill you just said no to? CoL: No on the industry, yes on the gambling. Though I think you were trying to illegalize it and did this by accident. |
| Date | 21:30:53, July 13, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Economics Bill |
| Message | SDP why are you voting on a bill you just said no to? We disagree with the industry, current nationalisations are fine. |
| Date | 21:36:29, July 13, 2005 CET | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the Economics Bill |
| Message | SPD said no to it when it was still in the debate stage and I had put the wrong gambling proposal on :P |
| Date | 23:09:18, July 13, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Economics Bill |
| Message | Yea, had a different gambling proposal in it |
| Date | 13:59:35, July 14, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Economics Bill |
| Message | Well, looks like it'll pass. Great job taking a step backwards towards stagnation! |
| Date | 17:54:24, July 14, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the Economics Bill |
| Message | This is a deliberate attack on bills I have passed. |
| Date | 00:09:23, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the Economics Bill |
| Message | That is a blatant un-truth. These views have been held, and actively supported by the CoL long before the SEP was formed. |
| Date | 06:07:41, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Social Libertarian party | To | Debating the Economics Bill |
| Message | I'm back:D |
| Date | 15:46:16, July 15, 2005 CET | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the Economics Bill |
| Message | YAY! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 351 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 358 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 41 |
| Random fact: Moderation reserves the discretion to declare RP laws invalid if the players supporting them are doing so in an excessively confrontational way. |
| Random quote: "I don't believe you need to be bitch to succeed in business" - Lucinda Redwood, former Luthorian-Dorvish businesswoman |