We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Privacy Act 2340
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Centrist Democrats
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2341
Description[?]:
| This proposal is meant to return to the state we had before the right wing rule. This law was changed during this sad episode. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.
Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Current: The confidentiality of letters is not inviolable.
Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:51:31, January 06, 2007 CET | From |  Absolutist Party | To | Debating the Privacy Act 2340 |
| Message | We oppose this. A private discourse is a private discourse, unless there is a criminal act involved, when it would involve more than one people. Whats next? Phone taps everywhere? Reading emails? Everyone must wear tracking devices? The LDRP are totalitarians whos only goal is to conquer Ikradon, who will not stop until all of the last guardians of true freedom, the AP and the INSP, are eliminated. |
| Date | 15:15:42, January 06, 2007 CET | From | New Democratic Party | To | Debating the Privacy Act 2340 |
| Message | We are very surprised that the LDRP is proposing allowing invasions of privacy without even the safeguard of judicial oversight, and more so that the Absolutists are actually promoting civil freedoms. Surely that is not a flying pig in the chamber? |
| Date | 19:35:46, January 06, 2007 CET | From | Progressive Centrist Democrats | To | Debating the Privacy Act 2340 |
| Message | OOC: Read again please, that's what i really meant. i didn't see the "not" and that's why i chose the wrong option. when you read my description you can guess the true intention. |
| Date | 03:47:07, January 07, 2007 CET | From | New Democratic Party | To | Debating the Privacy Act 2340 |
| Message | Oh ok. That's good. |
| Date | 03:52:41, January 07, 2007 CET | From | Absolutist Party | To | Debating the Privacy Act 2340 |
| Message | Now the LDRP swings too far in the other direction. Why are they such fanatics? Let the record show that the AP party caused the LDRP to completely turn around, however, like small children, they go too far yet again. Suppose a bombing takes place in a crowded place. The police track down the alleged perpetrator, who was known to be at the place the bomb was planted. He sends a letter to a known terrorist in a foriegn land, or receives a letter ordering another bombing. Contained in this letter evidence the police need to make a conviction. A judge may order it opened. Yet the LDRP prefers dead women and children instead. |
| Date | 18:26:29, January 07, 2007 CET | From | Progressive Centrist Democrats | To | Debating the Privacy Act 2340 |
| Message | may we remember you, that under your disgraceful rule gave this right not to judges but the minister of justice. and we did not swing nor flip flop, this whole controversy was just based on an unfortunate canard. |
| Date | 20:06:40, January 07, 2007 CET | From | Absolutist Party | To | Debating the Privacy Act 2340 |
| Message | Why do you attack our personal honor, instead of attacking our argument? May we remind you that it is the Justice department's job to investigate crimes? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 416 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 258 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 51 |
| Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "Corruption greases the wheels of government, and my private jet." - Sung Dae Kim, former Dranian politician |