We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Royal Orange League of Luthori (IA)[?]
This page contains information about the Royal Orange League of Luthori (IA).
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: Orange-Villayn
Nation[?]: Holy Luthorian Empire (Luthori)
Seats[?] in Imperial Diet (lower house), Imperial Senate (upper house)[?]: 16
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Orange is the official color of Ultraroyalism in the Holy Luthori Empire, due to the traditional House color and name of its legitimist dynasty, Orange-Villayn... An Ultraroyalist party, it's politics are mostly centrist, as it is made up both of clerics of the Holy Luthori Church (Right), and the non-Tory Luthori Aristocracy (Left) It's ultraroyalism refers to the fact that they support a direct governmental role for the Emperor, and more controversially, other members of the royal family such as the Crown Prince of Orange. Party Platforms: Centralization: Unitarism (Crown Authority) Civil-Rights: Permissive (Liberal Reforms) Ecology: Environmentalist (Conservationist) Foreign Relations: Isolationist (Luthori First) Government Responsibilities: Big Government (Crown Services) Market: Regulation (Oversight of the Crown) Military: Pacifist-Leaning (Preserve the Commonwealth) Morality: Progressive (Libertine Aristocracy) Religion: Secular-Religious (God is Good) |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | close to none | perfect |
Civil Rights | moderate permissive | limited | perfect |
Ecology | moderate environmentalist | limited | perfect |
Foreign Relations | convinced internationalist | close to none | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | small government-leaning | limited | perfect |
Market | moderate regulator | close to none | perfect |
Military | moderate pacifist | limited | perfect |
Morality | moderate progressive | close to none | perfect |
Religion | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
November 3584 | 31,784 | 65,352,997 | 0.05 | +0.05 | 0 | 500 | 0.00 | +0 |
November 3588 | 21,790,538 | 64,729,232 | 33.66 | +33.62 | 168 | 500 | 33.60 | +168 |
November 3592 | 19,297,827 | 64,554,047 | 29.89 | -3.77 | 150 | 500 | 30.00 | -18 |
November 3596 | 19,487,137 | 63,661,734 | 30.61 | +0.72 | 155 | 500 | 31.00 | +5 |
November 3600 | 21,688,560 | 62,491,786 | 34.71 | +4.10 | 225 | 649 | 34.67 | +70 |
November 3604 | 21,477,939 | 61,541,660 | 34.90 | +0.19 | 228 | 649 | 35.13 | +3 |
November 3608 | 24,593,727 | 57,741,575 | 42.59 | +7.69 | 276 | 649 | 42.53 | +48 |
November 3612 | 4,854,331 | 34,942,435 | 13.89 | -28.70 | 92 | 649 | 14.18 | -184 |
November 3616 | 4,996,383 | 29,804,625 | 16.76 | +2.87 | 110 | 649 | 16.95 | +18 |
November 3636 | 4,337,621 | 12,345,202 | 35.14 | +18.37 | 227 | 649 | 34.98 | +117 |
March 3638 | 5,753,531 | 12,004,073 | 47.93 | +12.79 | 312 | 649 | 48.07 | +85 |
March 3642 | 4,562,562 | 12,110,779 | 37.67 | -10.26 | 239 | 649 | 36.83 | -73 |
February 3646 | 3,090,872 | 12,418,393 | 24.89 | -12.78 | 163 | 649 | 25.12 | -76 |
February 3650 | 304,661 | 11,632,621 | 2.62 | -22.27 | 16 | 649 | 2.47 | -147 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Royal Orange League of Luthori (IA).
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Criminals voting | November 5069 | July 5070 | passed | ||
OOC: Luthori Discord | September 5069 | September 5069 | passed | ||
Luthorian names | September 5069 | September 5069 | passed | ||
Police Act 5070 | August 5069 | August 5069 | passed | ||
Online Safety Act 5070 | August 5069 | August 5069 | passed | ||
Riot Act 5070 | August 5069 | August 5069 | passed | ||
RP: Local elections: Polls predict tight race in Middenriding | July 5069 | July 5069 | defeated | ||
Diet size | March 5069 | March 5069 | defeated | ||
RP: Party profile - Conservatives | February 5069 | February 5069 | passed | ||
RP: Imperial Security Service reforms overturned | January 5069 | January 5069 | passed | ||
An Act to Tackle Climate Change | December 5068 | December 5068 | defeated | ||
Ecology | December 5068 | December 5068 | defeated | ||
CHP policies in local Governments | December 5068 | December 5068 | passed | ||
Strengthening of local governments | December 5068 | December 5068 | defeated | ||
Longer Diets | October 5068 | October 5068 | defeated | ||
RP: Army orders 800 new tanks | October 5068 | October 5068 | passed | ||
Income tax proposal of October 5068 | October 5068 | October 5068 | passed | ||
Lee Smith calls on the Grand Labour Party to form a Democratic and Republican Front | September 5068 | September 5068 | defeated | ||
RP: Agriculture minister: Rutania an 'irrelevant backwater' | September 5068 | September 5068 | passed | ||
RP: NUP 'unprincipled cowards' | August 5068 | August 5068 | passed |
Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |