We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Social-Conservative party[?]
This page contains information about the Social-Conservative party.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: República Federativa Tukarense (Tukarali)
Seats[?] in Assembleia da Republica Federativa - (Federal Assembly)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
| This party is founded on the Social-conservative ideals, that was practiced by the german Iron Chancellor Otto von Bismarck. The foundation of it is conservatism, backed with strong governmental controll, but also strong support for democracy, equal rights and so forth. The party is opposed to liberalisation of the society in most forms, however can agree on certain issues especially involving the democratic process. |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
| Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
| Centralization | moderate unitarist | high | perfect |
| Civil Rights | convinced restrictive | excellent | perfect |
| Ecology | skeptic-leaning | limited | perfect |
| Foreign Relations | isolationist-leaning | moderate | perfect |
| Government Responsibilities | small government-leaning | high | perfect |
| Market | convinced regulator | high | perfect |
| Military | moderate militarist | limited | perfect |
| Morality | moderate conservative | high | perfect |
| Religion | religious-leaning | high | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
| Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
| October 2148 | 2,041 | 33,372,216 | 0.01 | +0.01 | 0 | 299 | 0.00 | +0 |
| October 2151 | 1,567,551 | 31,937,577 | 4.91 | +4.90 | 14 | 299 | 4.68 | +14 |
| May 2155 | 4,548,594 | 35,376,960 | 12.86 | +7.95 | 38 | 299 | 12.71 | +24 |
| July 2158 | 4,853,698 | 38,011,718 | 12.77 | -0.09 | 39 | 299 | 13.04 | +1 |
| July 2161 | 4,571,341 | 37,437,556 | 12.21 | -0.56 | 37 | 299 | 12.37 | -2 |
| October 2164 | 5,627,850 | 40,864,982 | 13.77 | +1.56 | 41 | 299 | 13.71 | +4 |
| October 2167 | 5,917,560 | 37,535,455 | 15.77 | +1.99 | 49 | 299 | 16.39 | +8 |
| October 2170 | 4,701,505 | 40,535,201 | 11.60 | -4.17 | 34 | 299 | 11.37 | -15 |
| October 2173 | 2,488,258 | 41,033,409 | 6.06 | -5.53 | 16 | 299 | 5.35 | -18 |
| October 2176 | 3,039,106 | 41,662,023 | 7.29 | +1.23 | 21 | 299 | 7.02 | +5 |
| October 2179 | 3,280,465 | 42,163,934 | 7.78 | +0.49 | 22 | 299 | 7.36 | +1 |
| October 2182 | 4,209,040 | 42,483,086 | 9.91 | +2.13 | 28 | 299 | 9.36 | +6 |
| October 2185 | 5,100,173 | 42,781,020 | 11.92 | +2.01 | 36 | 299 | 12.04 | +8 |
| October 2188 | 6,281,077 | 41,334,000 | 15.20 | +3.27 | 47 | 299 | 15.72 | +11 |
| October 2191 | 5,607,105 | 40,778,655 | 13.75 | -1.45 | 40 | 299 | 13.38 | -7 |
| October 2194 | 5,611,919 | 41,574,139 | 13.50 | -0.25 | 41 | 299 | 13.71 | +1 |
| October 2197 | 6,007,519 | 39,966,894 | 15.03 | +1.53 | 44 | 299 | 14.72 | +3 |
| October 2200 | 6,757,826 | 44,858,348 | 15.06 | +0.03 | 46 | 299 | 15.38 | +2 |
| October 2203 | 5,856,055 | 46,730,173 | 12.53 | -2.53 | 36 | 299 | 12.04 | -10 |
| October 2206 | 9,218,141 | 47,960,429 | 19.22 | +6.69 | 57 | 299 | 19.06 | +21 |
| October 2209 | 8,440,008 | 47,141,623 | 17.90 | -1.32 | 90 | 499 | 18.04 | +33 |
| October 2212 | 7,429,297 | 45,778,044 | 16.23 | -1.67 | 82 | 499 | 16.43 | -8 |
| October 2215 | 6,237,712 | 45,035,499 | 13.85 | -2.38 | 69 | 499 | 13.83 | -13 |
| October 2218 | 3,659,832 | 45,811,418 | 7.99 | -5.86 | 39 | 499 | 7.82 | -30 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Social-Conservative party.
| Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
| Pirate reforms | May 3410 | May 3410 | defeated | ||
| Pot, hemp and workers Workers | May 3410 | May 3410 | defeated | ||
| Rum Act | May 3410 | May 3410 | defeated | ||
| Religion | May 3410 | May 3410 | defeated | ||
| jrie | October 3409 | October 3409 | defeated | ||
| Gay rights | June 3409 | June 3409 | defeated | ||
| Pirate Agenda | June 3409 | June 3409 | defeated | ||
| Energy Regulation | June 3409 | June 3409 | defeated | ||
| Pet reform | June 3409 | June 3409 | defeated | ||
| Cabinet Proposal of April 3408 | April 3408 | April 3408 | passed | ||
| Reforms | June 3405 | June 3405 | defeated | ||
| The Programme for Economic Reforms, 3404 | May 3404 | May 3404 | passed | ||
| Cabinet Proposal of April 3404 | April 3404 | April 3404 | passed | ||
| The Programme for Improved International Relations, 3403 | August 3403 | August 3403 | passed | ||
| The Programme for Better Education, 3403 | August 3403 | August 3403 | passed | ||
| Cabinet Proposal of February 3403 | February 3403 | February 3403 | passed | ||
| Cabinet Proposal of April 3400 | April 3400 | April 3400 | passed | ||
| The Programme for the Protection of Religious Beliefs, 3399 | April 3399 | April 3399 | passed | ||
| The Programme for More Local Development, 3399 | February 3399 | February 3399 | passed | ||
| Cabinet Proposal of April 3396 | April 3396 | April 3396 | passed |
| Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature. |
| Random quote: "If a female president can come here and be treated equally, why can't any other woman?" - Jewell C. Stillman, former Lourennais politician (on equal rights in Badara) |