We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Bøsser og Tosser[?]
This page contains information about the Bøsser og Tosser.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Kongeriket av Kazulmark (Kazulia)
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Farve, Liv og Glade Colour, Life and Happiness |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | convinced federalist | moderate | perfect |
Civil Rights | restrictive-leaning | high | perfect |
Ecology | convinced environmentalist | limited | perfect |
Foreign Relations | moderate internationalist | limited | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | moderate big government | limited | perfect |
Market | convinced regulator | limited | perfect |
Military | convinced pacifist | high | perfect |
Morality | moderate progressive | close to none | perfect |
Religion | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
June 2733 | 108,228 | 189,809,250 | 0.06 | +0.06 | 0 | 75 | 0.00 | +0 |
June 2739 | 18,994,425 | 192,888,037 | 9.85 | +9.79 | 7 | 75 | 9.33 | +7 |
June 2743 | 24,519,289 | 196,834,871 | 12.46 | +2.61 | 9 | 75 | 12.00 | +2 |
June 2749 | 21,762,755 | 204,731,255 | 10.63 | -1.83 | 7 | 75 | 9.33 | -2 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Bøsser og Tosser.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Income tax proposal of May 2646 | May 2646 | November 2646 | passed | ||
Devolution Act | May 2646 | May 2646 | passed | ||
Free Trade Act | May 2646 | May 2646 | passed | ||
Funding of public transport | May 2646 | May 2646 | passed | ||
The funding of sports clubs | May 2646 | May 2646 | defeated | ||
Environment Act | April 2646 | April 2646 | defeated | ||
Anti-Subsidation Act | April 2646 | April 2646 | passed | ||
Decent Learning Act | April 2646 | April 2646 | defeated | ||
Education Reform Act | April 2646 | April 2646 | defeated | ||
Pro-Life Act | April 2646 | April 2646 | defeated | ||
Government policy on energy generation. | April 2646 | April 2646 | defeated | ||
Free Market Act | December 2645 | December 2645 | defeated | ||
Social Reform Bill 14: Economic Bettering Act | November 2645 | November 2646 | defeated | ||
Social Reform Bill 13: International Openess Act | November 2645 | November 2646 | passed | ||
Social Reform Bill 12: Health and Education Freedoms and Strengthening Act | November 2645 | September 2646 | passed | ||
Social Reform Bill 11: Religious Encouragement Act | November 2645 | September 2646 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of November 2645 | November 2645 | November 2645 | defeated | ||
Social Reform Bill 10: New Equalized Cabinet Proposal | September 2645 | November 2645 | passed | ||
4th Treaty Withdrawal | September 2645 | September 2645 | defeated | ||
3rd treaty withdrawal | September 2645 | September 2645 | defeated |
Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English. |
Random quote: “Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule - and both commonly succeed, and are right.” --H.L. Mencken |