We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
National Labour Party[?]
This page contains information about the National Labour Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Kingdom of Hutori (Hutori)
Seats[?] in House of Parliament[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
| National Labour Party ***************************** - The NWP was a political movement in Hutori founded in 4627 with the aim to provide a solid alternative to both the left and right 'conventional' parties in the country. We believe that these mainstream parties have failed for hutorian people and so it is our primary aim to be a voice that will deliver, putting hutori first and foremost in all of our party policies. After dramatic ideological shift to the right, the Hutorian Fascist Party was formed in 4649 National Labour Party founded in 4654 after the six year spell of fascism resulted in alienation of the party in both parliament and elections. Established a more moderate tone Party Manifesto: ----------------------------------- - Economic freedom to allow for strong economic growth. - Socialist in domestic policy - Authoritarian leaning government Leadership: ----------------------------------- General Secretary: Simon Pratt MP (NLP 4662-) Parliamentary Leader n/a Former Leadership: ----------------------------------- Andrew Newland (NWP Leader 4631-4646) - served as President from 4641-4645 - served as Prime Minister from 4635-4641 William Mills (NWP 4646-4649) (HFP 4649-4651) - Served as minister of finance - Served as Prime Minister - Served as leader of the opposition Harriet Simpson (HFP 4651-4654) (NLP 4654-4662) - Served as leader of the Opposition from 4651-4654 - Served as President of the Executive Council of NCCH |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
| Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
| Centralization | moderate unitarist | moderate | perfect |
| Civil Rights | moderate restrictive | moderate | perfect |
| Ecology | convinced skeptic | moderate | perfect |
| Foreign Relations | moderate isolationist | moderate | perfect |
| Government Responsibilities | moderate big government | moderate | perfect |
| Market | moderate regulator | moderate | perfect |
| Military | convinced militarist | high | perfect |
| Morality | moderate conservative | moderate | perfect |
| Religion | secular-leaning | moderate | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
| Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
| April 4631 | 3,111,840 | 62,147,460 | 5.01 | +5.01 | 20 | 415 | 4.82 | +20 |
| April 4635 | 13,495,229 | 60,488,901 | 22.31 | +17.30 | 93 | 415 | 22.41 | +73 |
| August 4638 | 16,722,485 | 60,793,321 | 27.51 | +5.20 | 115 | 415 | 27.71 | +22 |
| September 4641 | 14,125,864 | 63,097,828 | 22.39 | -5.12 | 95 | 415 | 22.89 | -20 |
| September 4645 | 17,678,190 | 62,168,923 | 28.44 | +6.05 | 119 | 415 | 28.67 | +24 |
| August 4647 | 20,222,183 | 62,529,662 | 32.34 | +3.90 | 135 | 415 | 32.53 | +16 |
| August 4650 | 18,898,919 | 66,916,097 | 28.24 | -4.10 | 185 | 650 | 28.46 | +50 |
| September 4651 | 11,008,560 | 63,294,271 | 17.39 | -10.85 | 114 | 650 | 17.54 | -71 |
| September 4654 | 16,643,281 | 63,716,714 | 26.12 | +8.73 | 172 | 650 | 26.46 | +58 |
| September 4657 | 11,145,575 | 63,846,711 | 17.46 | -8.66 | 113 | 650 | 17.38 | -59 |
| September 4660 | 11,825,578 | 63,927,133 | 18.50 | +1.04 | 118 | 650 | 18.15 | +5 |
| September 4663 | 10,255,940 | 64,000,484 | 16.02 | -2.47 | 103 | 650 | 15.85 | -15 |
| September 4666 | 6,946,839 | 62,517,889 | 11.11 | -4.91 | 72 | 650 | 11.08 | -31 |
| September 4669 | 7,894,573 | 59,851,327 | 13.19 | +2.08 | 86 | 650 | 13.23 | +14 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the National Labour Party.
| Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
| Coalition for the Future, June 3280 | June 3280 | June 3280 | passed | ||
| Head of State Reform Bill | October 3279 | October 3279 | defeated | ||
| Call for early elections, August 3279 | August 3279 | February 3280 | passed | ||
| Agriculture Reform | December 3278 | March 3279 | passed | ||
| New Tec Laws | November 3278 | September 3279 | passed | ||
| Higher Education Act | November 3278 | December 3278 | passed | ||
| Pragmatic Party Budget proposal of June 3278 | June 3278 | September 3278 | defeated | ||
| Income tax proposal of May 3278 | May 3278 | June 3278 | defeated | ||
| Budget proposal of May 3278 | May 3278 | May 3278 | defeated | ||
| Economic Stimulus | June 3277 | May 3278 | passed | ||
| Cabinet Proposal of September 3276 | September 3276 | September 3276 | defeated | ||
| Forestry Bill 3276 | August 3276 | August 3276 | passed | ||
| DNA Use Act | September 3275 | June 3276 | passed | ||
| Military Reform | September 3275 | December 3275 | defeated | ||
| Cabinet Proposal of August 3275 | August 3275 | August 3275 | defeated | ||
| Bureaucracy Reform | June 3275 | June 3277 | passed | ||
| Call for early elections, April 3275 | April 3275 | April 3275 | passed | ||
| Cabinet Proposal of September 3274 | September 3274 | September 3274 | passed | ||
| Foreign Embassies Bill 3273 | September 3273 | September 3273 | passed | ||
| Immigration Bill 3273 | September 3273 | September 3273 | defeated |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "While we may not always agree it is my hope that we may always be civil." - Jonathan Clarke, former Hutorian politician |