We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Ordre de la Chambre[?]
This page contains information about the Ordre de la Chambre.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Communauté de Kanjor (Kanjor)
Seats[?] in Chambre des députés (Chamber of Deputies)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
| Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
| Centralization | unitarist-leaning | close to none | perfect |
| Civil Rights | unknown | close to none | perfect |
| Ecology | unknown | close to none | perfect |
| Foreign Relations | unknown | close to none | perfect |
| Government Responsibilities | convinced big government | close to none | perfect |
| Market | unknown | close to none | perfect |
| Military | unknown | close to none | perfect |
| Morality | unknown | close to none | perfect |
| Religion | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
| Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
| July 3140 | 11,797,087 | 11,797,087 | 100.00 | +100.00 | 101 | 101 | 100.00 | +101 |
| July 3146 | 12,242,857 | 12,242,857 | 100.00 | +0.00 | 101 | 101 | 100.00 | +0 |
| July 3152 | 12,088,412 | 12,088,412 | 100.00 | +0.00 | 101 | 101 | 100.00 | +0 |
| July 3158 | 11,672,266 | 11,722,372 | 99.57 | -0.43 | 101 | 101 | 100.00 | +0 |
| July 3164 | 11,595,055 | 11,595,055 | 100.00 | +0.43 | 101 | 101 | 100.00 | +0 |
| July 3170 | 11,909,942 | 11,909,942 | 100.00 | +0.00 | 101 | 101 | 100.00 | +0 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Ordre de la Chambre.
| Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
| c | May 2161 | December 2161 | passed | ||
| b | May 2161 | December 2161 | passed | ||
| A | May 2161 | December 2161 | passed | ||
| Totalitarian State | January 2161 | January 2161 | passed | ||
| HoS | January 2161 | January 2161 | defeated | ||
| New Legislative Act | December 2160 | December 2160 | defeated | ||
| Rumeration of Ministers | December 2160 | December 2160 | defeated | ||
| Religious Taxation | December 2160 | December 2160 | passed | ||
| State Ministers | December 2160 | December 2160 | defeated | ||
| Adoption Policy | December 2160 | December 2160 | defeated | ||
| State Agriculture | December 2160 | December 2160 | defeated | ||
| Animal Ownership | December 2160 | December 2160 | passed | ||
| Animal Experimentation | December 2160 | December 2160 | passed | ||
| Public Education | December 2160 | December 2160 | defeated | ||
| g | November 2160 | December 2161 | defeated | ||
| f | November 2160 | December 2161 | passed | ||
| e | November 2160 | December 2161 | passed | ||
| d | November 2160 | December 2161 | passed | ||
| c | November 2160 | December 2161 | passed | ||
| b | November 2160 | December 2161 | passed |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." - Ed Fallon |