We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Democratic Monarchist Party[?]
This page contains information about the Democratic Monarchist Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Holy Luthorian Empire (Luthori)
Seats[?] in Imperial Diet (lower house), Imperial Senate (upper house)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
The Democratic Monarchist Party is a broad tent left wing party, consisting of liberals and social democrats. The main unifying position of the party is their support of monarchism, believing that the head of state should be above partisan politics. In addition, the party supports progressive tax reform, civil rights expansion, moderate interventionism, free trade, and a humanitarian foreign policy. Because of their monarchism, the DMP gives the Party President the role of presidential candidate, with his job being to ensure a smooth transition of the head of state. However, all policy making would be done by the highest ranking figure in the legislature. Party Leader John Wilkins (4251- ) Deputy Leader George Flynn (4251- ) Party President Edmund Anthony (4251- ) |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | moderate federalist | high | perfect |
Civil Rights | restrictive-leaning | high | perfect |
Ecology | moderate environmentalist | limited | perfect |
Foreign Relations | convinced internationalist | limited | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | small government-leaning | high | perfect |
Market | regulator-leaning | high | perfect |
Military | convinced militarist | close to none | perfect |
Morality | conservative-leaning | high | perfect |
Religion | secular-leaning | high | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
March 4252 | 607,030 | 67,825,477 | 0.89 | +0.89 | 3 | 400 | 0.75 | +3 |
June 4253 | 730,418 | 66,703,197 | 1.10 | +0.20 | 4 | 400 | 1.00 | +1 |
June 4258 | 3,156,597 | 65,970,149 | 4.78 | +3.69 | 17 | 400 | 4.25 | +13 |
May 4260 | 2,990,213 | 64,496,509 | 4.64 | -0.15 | 16 | 400 | 4.00 | -1 |
January 4262 | 9,299,378 | 64,750,328 | 14.36 | +9.73 | 58 | 400 | 14.50 | +42 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Democratic Monarchist Party.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
WR Manifesto 4445 | August 4444 | August 4444 | defeated | ||
Banking Sector Nationalization Act II | July 4444 | July 4444 | passed | ||
Electricity Nationalization Act | July 4444 | July 4444 | passed | ||
Police Powers Act | July 4444 | July 4444 | defeated | ||
Border Protection Act | July 4444 | July 4444 | passed | ||
Capital Punishment Act 4444 [Repeal] | July 4444 | July 4444 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, April 4444 | April 4444 | April 4444 | defeated | ||
TUSC Secularism Act 4444 | November 4443 | November 4443 | defeated | ||
Banking Sector Nationalization Act | June 4443 | June 4443 | defeated | ||
Workforce Enhancement Act | June 4443 | June 4443 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of May 4443 | May 4443 | May 4443 | passed | ||
TUSC Shadow Budget | March 4443 | April 4444 | defeated | ||
Income tax proposal of February 4443 | February 4443 | February 4443 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of November 4442 | November 4442 | November 4442 | passed | ||
Constitutional Reform Act 4442 | October 4442 | October 4442 | defeated | ||
Luxury Tax Review 4442 | October 4442 | October 4442 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of February 4442 | February 4442 | September 4442 | defeated | ||
Welfare act 4422 | January 4442 | January 4442 | defeated | ||
TUSC Freedom and Secularism Act Part 2 | November 4440 | April 4442 | defeated | ||
TUSC Constitutional Reform Act | November 4440 | April 4442 | defeated |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |