We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Party for Overall National Security[?]
This page contains information about the Party for Overall National Security.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Respubliko de Zardujo (Zardugal)
Seats[?] in Leĝdonaro (Legislature)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
"The Party for Overall National Security claims overall security, be it military security or internal security. The people of Zardugal shall not have to fear anything, no military attacks, no criminal attacks, no problems with immigrants, health care or retirement pay. The army as much as the police shall be protector of all the people." Sergej Maljadkin, party leader "The party's first priority are the people of Zardugal. No other influential group or even nation shall make profit of the prefectural consulate's policy, if not everything is allready done for the genuine people of Zardugal. In fact, the people's economy, education and life is under permanent threat by explioters of all kinds, be it economical exploiters, be it criminals as exploiters of the people's individual wealth, be it other nations as exploiters of Zardugal's peculiar culture. To avoid this dangers a strong police and military on the one hand, but also a tight legislation on the other hand is essential. That is mainly what the PONS stands for." Vlad Djarschinskij, candidate for Justice |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | moderate unitarist | limited | perfect |
Civil Rights | moderate restrictive | moderate | perfect |
Ecology | skeptic-leaning | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | moderate isolationist | limited | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | convinced big government | high | perfect |
Market | convinced regulator | high | perfect |
Military | convinced militarist | limited | perfect |
Morality | conservative-leaning | limited | perfect |
Religion | secular-leaning | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
April 2313 | 37,806 | 63,580,401 | 0.06 | +0.06 | 0 | 333 | 0.00 | +0 |
April 2317 | 9,880,270 | 59,614,020 | 16.57 | +16.51 | 54 | 333 | 16.22 | +54 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Party for Overall National Security.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Passport act | June 2502 | June 2502 | passed | ||
Train Operating Companies | June 2502 | June 2502 | passed | ||
Expansion of Public Transport Funding | June 2502 | June 2502 | defeated | ||
Public Decency and Sexual Leniency | June 2502 | June 2502 | passed | ||
Protection of Children | June 2502 | June 2502 | defeated | ||
Right to Confidential Correspondence | June 2502 | June 2502 | defeated | ||
Freedom of Marriage Act | June 2502 | June 2502 | defeated | ||
Ratification of the International Agreement on Climatre Protection | June 2502 | June 2502 | defeated | ||
People's Right to Assemble | June 2502 | June 2502 | defeated | ||
Cannibalism & Necrophilia Act | May 2502 | May 2502 | defeated | ||
Firearm Ownership Act | April 2502 | April 2502 | defeated | ||
Councils Act | April 2502 | April 2502 | defeated | ||
R. A-1: Economic Embargo of Gishoto | March 2502 | March 2502 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, March 2502 | March 2502 | March 2502 | defeated | ||
Death Penalty bill | December 2501 | December 2501 | passed | ||
Telecommunications bill | December 2501 | December 2501 | defeated | ||
Sale of tobacco bill | December 2501 | December 2501 | passed | ||
Contraceptive bill | December 2501 | December 2501 | passed | ||
Shelters bill | December 2501 | December 2501 | defeated | ||
Raising of the retirement age | December 2501 | December 2501 | passed |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |