We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Constitutionalist Constitutional Cotitty[?]
This page contains information about the Constitutionalist Constitutional Cotitty.
This party is inactive.
Details
User[?]: Religious Fanatic
Nation[?]: Holy Luthorian Empire (Luthori)
Seats[?] in Imperial Diet (lower house), Imperial Senate (upper house)[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
The CCC is made up of high powered luthori royalty that cares little about the people, but cares much about the powerful interest of the elite. |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | moderate unitarist | high | perfect |
Civil Rights | restrictive-leaning | high | perfect |
Ecology | skeptic-leaning | moderate | perfect |
Foreign Relations | isolationist-leaning | high | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | moderate small government | high | perfect |
Market | moderate laissez-faire | high | perfect |
Military | convinced militarist | high | perfect |
Morality | moderate conservative | high | perfect |
Religion | moderate religious | high | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
June 3268 | 260,914 | 11,970,567 | 2.18 | +2.18 | 2 | 105 | 1.90 | +2 |
February 3270 | 253,756 | 12,702,411 | 2.00 | -0.18 | 11 | 649 | 1.69 | +9 |
February 3274 | 7,830,643 | 37,062,185 | 21.13 | +19.13 | 126 | 649 | 19.41 | +115 |
May 3274 | 4,306,800 | 12,689,536 | 33.94 | +12.81 | 222 | 649 | 34.21 | +96 |
May 3278 | 3,605,126 | 11,989,305 | 30.07 | -3.87 | 199 | 649 | 30.66 | -23 |
May 3282 | 3,795,313 | 11,615,232 | 32.68 | +2.61 | 213 | 649 | 32.82 | +14 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Constitutionalist Constitutional Cotitty.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Death Penalty | January 4062 | November 4062 | defeated | ||
Income tax proposal of January 4062 | January 4062 | January 4062 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of November 4061 | November 4061 | November 4061 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of November 4061 | November 4061 | November 4061 | defeated | ||
Constitutional Reform Committee Proposal | August 4061 | July 4062 | passed | ||
Right to Life Act | August 4061 | November 4061 | defeated | ||
Solidarity of the Political Parties in the Nation against the failed coup | July 4061 | February 4066 | defeated | ||
Motion of no Confidence | July 4061 | July 4061 | passed | ||
Sports Clubs | May 4061 | November 4061 | passed | ||
Nudity | May 4061 | November 4061 | passed | ||
Museum Funding | May 4061 | November 4061 | passed | ||
Prime Minsters Questions Act | May 4061 | November 4061 | passed | ||
IVF | January 4061 | January 4061 | defeated | ||
Advertising | January 4061 | January 4061 | defeated | ||
Economy 3 | January 4061 | January 4061 | passed | ||
Shift in Union Power | December 4060 | December 4060 | defeated | ||
Foreign investments | July 4060 | July 4060 | defeated | ||
Health Care Reforms of 4060 | July 4060 | July 4060 | passed | ||
Regulation of Stock Exchanges | June 4060 | August 4060 | passed | ||
Ridding ourselves of the ACP | June 4060 | June 4060 | passed |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "There is a mandate to impose a voluntary return to traditional values." - Ronald Reagan |