We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Conglomeratist Party[?]
This page contains information about the Conglomeratist Party.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Empire of Ananto and Kalistan (Kalistan)
Seats[?] in National Assembly of Deputies[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
A conglomerate is a vertically integrated supply chain. Conglomeratism seeks to take this vertical integration as a cultural model where stakeholders in various affiliates cultivate craftsmanship for how things work and why they're important. That way, people produce for a purpose, not just for production's sake. For example, a logging company could cultivate craftsmanship with a baseball stadium. The foundation of this is a redefinition of the word "profit" - profit is the availability of free time to apply in pursuit of the arts. As long as stakeholders are artistic, there is no need to regulate them. It's when they become gluttonous that regulation becomes necessary. Furthermore, gluttony is a qualitative, not quantitative, yardstick. It is measured by how completely, not efficiently, resources are organized. For those convinced this is just another liberal, conservative, or socialist party, think again. Conglomeratism advocates analytic jurisprudence such that stakeholders in a conglomerate think before they act. This means a rejection of the following "ideals": Consumerism Fatalism Historicism Industrialism Pragmatism Professionalism Rugged Individualism Workaholism Instead, conglomeratism emphasizes holistic universalism where society is well-founded in reasonable people. This means preserving social fabric through customs, values, discourse ethics, rules of engagement, due process, and procedural justice. It does not mean simply making dogmatic appeals to popular emotion to make things happen. Rather it means doing things correctly through a conglomerate's profitable craftsmanship. It also means embracing political cycles. A stagnant government that believes in a particular platform will inevitably become subverted. This can happen from obedient servants rising to the top only to deliberately misinterpret policy, and it can happen from the political establishment conspiring to maintain a cartel on political capital behind the guise of balance of power. Regardless, official platforms must be cycled in order to prevent ambitious corruption. That way, policy remains philosophical instead of serving special interests. That philosophy preserves craftsmanship's abstract inspiration instead of letting it succumb to a particular material fetish. |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Civil Rights | restrictive-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Ecology | skeptic-leaning | close to none | perfect |
Foreign Relations | isolationist-leaning | limited | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | small government-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Market | regulator-leaning | excellent | perfect |
Military | moderate militarist | close to none | perfect |
Morality | moderate conservative | excellent | perfect |
Religion | moderate religious | excellent | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
April 3373 | 18,106,247 | 54,183,076 | 33.42 | +33.42 | 259 | 750 | 34.53 | +259 |
April 3376 | 20,464,365 | 59,738,511 | 34.26 | +0.84 | 254 | 750 | 33.87 | -5 |
April 3379 | 15,639,027 | 56,666,823 | 27.60 | -6.66 | 201 | 750 | 26.80 | -53 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Conglomeratist Party.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Outlawing Monopolies | August 4546 | August 4546 | passed | ||
Subsidies for the Military, Petrol, and Iron Industries | August 4546 | August 4546 | passed | ||
Federalisation Program I | July 4546 | July 4546 | passed | ||
Cabinet Proposal of June 4546 | June 4546 | June 4546 | passed | ||
Omnibusian Omnibus ### | July 4545 | July 4545 | defeated | ||
Liberty Act | May 4544 | May 4544 | passed | ||
Radical Brethrenist Omnibus | September 4543 | September 4543 | defeated | ||
Colbertist Omnibus | September 4543 | September 4543 | passed | ||
Ewartist Omnibus | September 4543 | September 4543 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of July 4543 | July 4543 | July 4543 | passed | ||
Infrastructure Revival Act | June 4542 | June 4542 | defeated | ||
Competitive Health-Care Bill | June 4542 | June 4542 | defeated | ||
Anti-Big Brother Bill | June 4542 | June 4542 | passed | ||
Budget proposal of January 4542 | January 4542 | January 4542 | defeated | ||
Liberal Adjustments | November 4540 | December 4540 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of October 4540 | October 4540 | October 4540 | defeated | ||
LRP Omnibus | October 4540 | October 4540 | defeated | ||
Cabinet Proposal of June 4540 | June 4540 | June 4540 | passed | ||
Ratification of the Seleyan Economic Area Treaty | April 4540 | October 4540 | defeated | ||
Call for early elections, April 4540 | April 4540 | April 4540 | passed |
Random fact: Each user account may only be used by the player who set it up. Handing over an account to another player is not allowed. |
Random quote: "Democracy is more dangerous than fire. Fire can't vote itself immune to water." - Michael Z. Williamson |