We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
| Details | Ministries | Political Positions | Affiliations | Election Results | Legislation | Legislative Agenda | Voting Record | Actions | Messages |
Lodamun Democratic Alliance[?]
This page contains information about the Lodamun Democratic Alliance.
This party is inactive.
Details
Nation[?]: Commonwealth of Lodamun (Lodamun)
Seats[?] in National Congress[?]: 0
Color[?]:
Description[?]:
The Lodumun Democratic Party is a party that stands for democracy, full citizens rights and economic development making sure that everyone has a decent life free from the constraints of poverty. |
Ministries
This party is not part of the national cabinet.
Political Positions
Ideology | Position | Visibility | Coherency |
Centralization | unitarist-leaning | limited | perfect |
Civil Rights | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Ecology | skeptic-leaning | limited | perfect |
Foreign Relations | isolationist-leaning | close to none | perfect |
Government Responsibilities | moderate big government | limited | perfect |
Market | regulator-leaning | moderate | perfect |
Military | moderate pacifist | limited | perfect |
Morality | unknown | close to none | perfect |
Religion | secular-leaning | close to none | perfect |
Affiliations
This party is a member of the following organizations:
Election Results
History Table
Month | Votes | Total Votes | Votes (%) | Votes (%) (+) | Seats | Total Seats | Seats (%) | Seats (+) |
August 4457 | 5,592,595 | 62,001,642 | 9.02 | +9.02 | 53 | 599 | 8.85 | +53 |
August 4461 | 17,779,476 | 61,169,933 | 29.07 | +20.05 | 175 | 599 | 29.22 | +122 |
August 4465 | 18,890,614 | 54,383,619 | 34.74 | +5.67 | 211 | 599 | 35.23 | +36 |
August 4469 | 16,493,627 | 50,718,500 | 32.52 | -2.22 | 198 | 599 | 33.06 | -13 |
August 4473 | 16,945,765 | 52,980,170 | 31.99 | -0.53 | 191 | 599 | 31.89 | -7 |
May 4476 | 17,778,943 | 51,343,009 | 34.63 | +2.64 | 62 | 179 | 34.64 | -129 |
May 4480 | 18,084,662 | 51,901,201 | 34.84 | +0.22 | 63 | 179 | 35.20 | +1 |
May 4484 | 16,851,153 | 50,087,906 | 33.64 | -1.20 | 61 | 179 | 34.08 | -2 |
May 4486 | 21,104,351 | 61,595,081 | 34.26 | +0.62 | 62 | 179 | 34.64 | +1 |
May 4490 | 22,844,386 | 62,669,337 | 36.45 | +2.19 | 65 | 179 | 36.31 | +3 |
May 4494 | 23,367,091 | 64,756,976 | 36.08 | -0.37 | 64 | 179 | 35.75 | -1 |
February 4502 | 20,591,676 | 63,481,329 | 32.44 | -3.65 | 59 | 179 | 32.96 | -5 |
September 4504 | 21,299,541 | 60,258,836 | 35.35 | +2.91 | 63 | 179 | 35.20 | +4 |
April 4507 | 21,272,140 | 43,337,317 | 49.09 | +13.74 | 89 | 179 | 49.72 | +26 |
April 4511 | 19,224,620 | 40,578,503 | 47.38 | -1.71 | 87 | 179 | 48.60 | -2 |
April 4515 | 17,822,311 | 41,960,024 | 42.47 | -4.90 | 76 | 179 | 42.46 | -11 |
November 4526 | 8,576,969 | 67,310,810 | 12.74 | -29.73 | 39 | 300 | 13.00 | -37 |
November 4528 | 4,335,721 | 67,406,674 | 6.43 | -6.31 | 19 | 300 | 6.33 | -20 |
Relative Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election, relative to its maximum.
Absolute Graph
This graph shows the percentage of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature.
National Graph
This graph shows the share of seats the party achieved in each election in the entire legislature, together with the share of other parties.
Legislation
You can view the party's proposed bills here.
Legislative Agenda
This party has to vote on the following bills:
Voting Record
This is the voting[?] record of the Lodamun Democratic Alliance.
Bill | Created | Voting started | Vote | Bill Status | Result |
Land Mines Act of 4459 | April 4459 | April 4459 | abstain | defeated | abstained |
Foreign Reform | September 4458 | September 4458 | yes | defeated | lost |
Ecology Reform Bill | September 4458 | September 4458 | yes | defeated | lost |
Conscientious Objector Act of 4458 | June 4458 | June 4458 | yes | defeated | lost |
Cabinet Proposal of March 4458 | March 4458 | July 4458 | yes | defeated | lost |
Admin Reform Bill | March 4458 | July 4458 | yes | defeated | lost |
Infrastructure Reform | March 4458 | March 4458 | yes | defeated | lost |
Military Reform Bill | March 4458 | March 4458 | yes | defeated | lost |
Conscientious Objector Act of 4457 | October 4457 | October 4457 | yes | defeated | lost |
Cabinet Proposal of August 4457 | August 4457 | August 4457 | abstain | passed | abstained |
CDUL Manifesto Justice | October 4456 | October 4456 | no | defeated | won |
CDUL Manifesto economy | October 4456 | October 4456 | no | defeated | won |
CDUL Manifesto Health | September 4456 | October 4456 | no | defeated | won |
CDUL Manifesto Religion | September 4456 | October 4456 | yes | passed | won |
4th Cabinet Proposal | September 4456 | September 4456 | abstain | defeated | abstained |
Economic Stability Act | March 4456 | March 4456 | abstain | defeated | abstained |
Cabinet Proposal of January 4456 | January 4456 | January 4456 | abstain | defeated | abstained |
Broad Coalition | December 4455 | December 4455 | abstain | defeated | abstained |
All for the nation act | September 4455 | January 4456 | abstain | passed | abstained |
Affordable pension act | September 4455 | January 4456 | abstain | defeated | abstained |
Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost. |
Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |