We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Food safty
Details
Submitted by[?]: Independent party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2360
Description[?]:
| changing food safety |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Listing of controversial ingredients, such as genetically modified (GM) ingredients (if food labelling is applied).
Old value:: There is no requirement to disclose GM ingredients, or chemicals used in agrigulture or processing.
Current: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing, and any GM ingredients must be listed.
Proposed: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing, and any GM ingredients must be listed.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Food safety policy.
Old value:: There are no food standards provisions.
Current: The government introduces, and actively enforces, food standards provisions.
Proposed: The government recommends food safety standards, but they are not enforced upon businesses.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Health and safety legislation for industry.
Old value:: There are no set health and safety regulations for industry.
Current: The government recommends health and safety legislation, but they are not actively enforced on industry.
Proposed: The government introduces and actively regulates health and safety legislation in all areas of industry.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:50:13, February 14, 2007 CET | From | United Democrats of Jakania | To | Debating the Food safty |
| Message | Apart from spelling "safety" wrong, this is good. Why was it not sent to a vote? |
| Date | 20:16:36, February 14, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Party | To | Debating the Food safty |
| Message | We do not support Article 2 in this bill. A government reccommends? If a government reccommends something the company doesn't have to listen to them. If a government enforces food safety laws, then a company must comply with what the government wants. |
| Date | 00:22:46, February 15, 2007 CET | From | Independent party | To | Debating the Food safty |
| Message | that is so it is not forced aponed then and they cannot go to jail for something so small |
| Date | 00:53:36, February 15, 2007 CET | From | United Democrats of Jakania | To | Debating the Food safty |
| Message | Food safety standards is not something small |
| Date | 01:24:41, February 15, 2007 CET | From | Moderate Republican Party | To | Debating the Food safty |
| Message | We agree with the L.D.P.'s statement about Article 2. A recommendation is a reccomendation and does not need to be followed. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 18 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 82 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: You can view helpful ideological statistics about the regions in your nation on the region pages. You can also view detailed political opinions and the importance of them there as well. |
| Random quote: "A politician who is poor is a poor politician." - Carlos Hank Gonzalez |