Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 00:36:05
Server time: 23:23:54, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Klexi | luthorian3059 | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Jakania Citizens' Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2363

Description[?]:

For all our Military needs.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:30:20, February 20, 2007 CET
FromLiberal Democratic Party
ToDebating the Military Bill
MessageThis is perhaps the most detrimental legislation written and presented to the Supreme Council for a vote yet. We hope that fellow party members share our view on this disasterous bill. After working to change our nation from the terrors it witheld, we can now see them reversed by legislation like this.

Date06:52:28, February 20, 2007 CET
FromScientific Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Military Bill
MessageOn the one hand, we are in favour of using the threat of Massive Retaliation to deter attacks, while not actually being in favour of said hyperdestructive weaponry itself. On the other hand, we will not be in power forever, and cannot necessarily trust anyone else not to actually, you know, use the weapons themselves, which would of course be abhorrent. Leaving aside the obvious fact that any majority government willing to use WMDs could just reverse this legislation and make it legal. But as it would kind of defeat the purpose to enact legislation specifying that the government can threaten Massive Retaliation but cannot actually, you know, retaliate massively, we're going to have to leave them banned and keep our military old-fashioned.

Date01:05:28, February 21, 2007 CET
FromScientific Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Military Bill
MessageWe were sorely tempted to reverse our position on this issue in the light of Solentian hostility, but then we realized: These bloodthirsty fascists are unlikely to be swayed by mere threats, and we would be unwilling to actually use the weaponry, so keeping it around would be pointless. We consider keeping a stockpile of high-yield nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles in case our nation is invaded and overrun, if all else fails, the destruction of their infrastructure and war machine could allow us to push them back out. But for now, still no.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 122

no
      

Total Seats: 358

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Once approved, players should copy Cultural Protocols into a bill in the debate section of their nation page, under the title of "OOC: Cultural Protocols". This bill should include links to the passed Cultural Protocol bill and the Moderation approval.

    Random quote: "What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and democracy?" - Mahatma Gandhi.

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 64