We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of August 2092
Details
Submitted by[?]: Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2093
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Humanism-Scientism Collusion
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Catholic Workers Movement
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Catholic Workers Movement
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Humanism-Scientism Collusion
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Humanism-Scientism Collusion
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:02:04, August 08, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2092 |
Message | Apologies for the delay. |
Date | 23:37:26, August 08, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2092 |
Message | Yay! I' m still in the current cabinet. Booh! I'm not in the new one! ((OOC: you lazy people :P)) |
Date | 03:46:28, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Catholic Workers Movement | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2092 |
Message | ((it wasn't laziness, it was the sudden disappearance of the Free Beluzians, damn their vanishing tendencies!)) It would be an honour to serve in this cabinet, Madame President. |
Date | 05:44:53, August 09, 2005 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2092 |
Message | Thinking... |
Date | 12:03:06, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2092 |
Message | I see this country is split. The PPP and myself against you lot. Well its your loss because you don't get to see the comical names of my cabinet members.... Nah I'm only joking. We do need a cabinet. why are the SLP back? |
Date | 13:58:02, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2092 |
Message | I need to put this up now or we're not going to get a cabinet at all. |
Date | 15:17:20, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2092 |
Message | You never established a different cabinet, so it makes sense that I am still in it when you return. |
Date | 20:39:28, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Catholic Workers Movement | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2092 |
Message | I hope everyone in the cabinet can vote for it so we have a government for the first time in a decade. Maybe after that we can ask NMRP to shuffle the portfolios if some parties feel short-changed. But we need a cabinet! |
Date | 20:56:50, August 09, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of August 2092 |
Message | We hope that, after these elections, a cabinet reshuffle will be considered to accomocate for SLP votes - should the current government retain a majority. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 143 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 97 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 60 |
Random fact: Periodically, it is a good idea to go through your nation's Treaties and arrange to withdraw from any that are unwanted. |
Random quote: "I'm not a leftist; I'm where the righteous ought to be." - M.M. Coady |