Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 03:24:36
Server time: 00:35:23, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Treaty Withdrawal Reprise (2595)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Normand Pluralist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2596

Description[?]:

We propose, per discussion, to withdraw from the following treaties (hoping that the Archonists will be present for the vote):

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date08:04:13, June 22, 2008 CET
From 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawal Reprise (2595)
MessageWe are opposed to leaving either treaty.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 221

no
  

Total Seats: 247

abstain
 

Total Seats: 79


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "Conservatives define themselves in terms of what they oppose." - George Will

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 37