Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5476
Next month in: 03:43:06
Server time: 16:16:53, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): NL | Ost | Paulo Nogueira | SocDemDundorfian | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of November 2626

Details

Submitted by[?]: Kirlawan People's Justice Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2627

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:13:03, August 25, 2008 CET
FromKirlawan People's Justice Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2626
MessageDSP have stated that they refuse to work with AEA; but everyone else gets a ministry or two.

Also, the Nick Fisk Party don't have any seats yet, and I'm worried that they might be on the verge of giving up :(
Including them in this cabinet might help to encourage them to please stay, so we'll offer two cabinet positions that otherwise would have been allocated to KPJP.

Any requests, for ministry swaps or anything else, before we start the vote?

Date16:37:41, August 25, 2008 CET
FromKirlawan National Party (Leftists)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2626
MessageI guess the KPJP is right. We should give the NFP some encouragement to stay, because their election results have been, should I say, discouraging. This cabinent seems fair for most parties, and we will tolerate the WMS in the cabinet. So we support.

Date05:22:12, August 26, 2008 CET
FromKirlawan People's National Congress
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2626
MessageWe will tolerate the WMS as well. We accept our positions.

I just don't think NFP deserves as much seats as we do...

Date16:55:18, August 26, 2008 CET
FromKirlawan National Party (Leftists)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2626
MessagePerhaps it would have been better to give them one seat, rather than two.

Date19:10:59, August 26, 2008 CET
FromKirlawan People's National Congress
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2626
MessageI don't think this can even really pass as they are not that active it seems...

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 511

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 206


    Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

    Random quote: The U.N. is a place where governments opposed to free speech demand to be heard. - MAD Magazine

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 66