We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Economic Stabilisation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Irkan Tomorrow Cabal
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2041
Description[?]:
WHEREAS we acknowledge communist and socialism to be morally and ethically evil. RECOGNISING the growing link between trade unions and the above political movements, and the danger they pose to our economy. THEREFORE Trade unions are illegal. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards labor unions.
Old value:: Trade unions may exist and worker membership is voluntary.
Current: Trade unions may exist and worker membership is voluntary.
Proposed: Trade unions are illegal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | not recorded | From | Irkan Tomorrow Cabal | To | Debating the Economic Stabilisation Act |
Message | Pinko! |
Date | not recorded | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Economic Stabilisation Act |
Message | And how. |
Date | not recorded | From | Progressive Evolution Party | To | Debating the Economic Stabilisation Act |
Message | You realize that there are election penalties for proposing bills that get defeated, right? Just curious... You spend political capital and look like an ineffective party. It's less fun when the dictator goes down the shithole, y'see. :( |
Date | not recorded | From | Progressive Pragmatists | To | Debating the Economic Stabilisation Act |
Message | Actually bringing a bill to the floor and having it defeated is worth it if the stigma of voting against it hurts the other parties more then the defeat hurt you! But still how could this bill help anyone? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 72 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 219 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
Random quote: " A government which robs Peter to pay Paul, can always count on the support of Paul." - George Bernard Shaw |