We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Gov.0051.2673 Cabinet Proposal
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2674
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet, according to election laws: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=225528 Adjustments made according to the judgement against the DSP: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=198268 (expires 2694) Exclusions made according to the election law amendment: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=228827 Including amendment to the election law of 2671: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=229025 DSP : 116/570 * 13 = 2.6456 > 2 + 1 CP : 116/570 * 13 = 2.6456 > 2 MSMP : 83/570 * 13 = 1.8930 1 + 1 AUP : 74/570 * 13 = 1.6877 > 1 + 1 CUTE : 72/570 * 13 = 1.6421 > 1 + 1 FWP : 66/570 * 13 = 1.5053 > 1 TGP : 43/570 * 13 = 0.9807 > 0 + 1 DP : 30/--- * 13 = 0.0000 > 0 Current Blocks: DSP: 1 abstain (*1) AUP: 2 abstains (*2)(*3) FWP: 1 abstain (*4) (*1): http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=228825 (*2): http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=229024 (*3): http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=229137 (*4): http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=229345 Tenno edit 1: DP is excluded from cabinet due to exclusion law. Proof stems from their nation message at 15:04:53, November 21, 2008 CET. Tenno edit 2: DSP received the seat instead of CP because of DSP's higher popular vote in the last election (http://classic.particracy.net/viewnews.php?newsid=192183) I wish this cabinet the best of luck, working together for the betterment of Sekowo. |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Conservative Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Central Union of Trade and Economy
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the 
Imperial Pluralism Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Free Workers Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Central Union of Trade and Economy
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Conservative Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Imperial Pluralism Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the United Land Movement
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Revolutionary State Socialist Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Revolutionary State Socialist Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:25:39, November 30, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Gov.0051.2673 Cabinet Proposal |
| Message | Mayhap we should create an emergency cabinet amendment allowing for parties to be excluded in situation like this. |
| Date | 08:47:02, November 30, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Gov.0051.2673 Cabinet Proposal |
| Message | Well, everyone is abstain at different times. To be precise ... three parties over four different times. Not quite sure what you want to do with this. Set a limit to the number of cabinet proposals a Tenno must make under the law and then after that, the Tenno does as (s)he wishes with the cabinet proposal? Not sure how you want to give more power to the Tenno while still being fair. But it's a valid discussion point. |
| Date | 09:39:27, November 30, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Gov.0051.2673 Cabinet Proposal |
| Message | I was thinking of just adding to the abstention amendment. Say if, over a period of three consecutive cabinet proposals they fail do to abstains an emergency cabinet may be formed proportionally from the active and/or only abstaining in the first cabinet parties. |
| Date | 09:46:28, November 30, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Gov.0051.2673 Cabinet Proposal |
| Message | That would render abstain blocks useless then. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 461 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 30 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 109 |
| Random fact: There are two countries based on Egypt in the game. Cobura is based on modern Egypt with a retro twist, while Hawu Mumenhes is based on Ancient Egypt with a modernist twist. |
| Random quote: "It is the absolute right of the State to supervise the formation of public opinion." - Joseph Goebbels |