We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Environment Act, 3331
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3332
Description[?]:
| A bill to: 1) Establish a national forestry agency which subcontracts work to private companies, and 2) To provide non-enforceable guidelines for the reduction of pollution |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Current: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns all forests, but subcontracts the work to private companies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Current: The government provides pollution prevention guidelines, but does not enforce them.
Proposed: The government provides pollution prevention guidelines, but does not enforce them.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:39:37, July 09, 2012 CET | From | Zardio Federisma Partio | To | Debating the Environment Act, 3331 |
| Message | The CRP opposes Article 2 which will worsen the environment and air quality. |
| Date | 00:19:16, July 10, 2012 CET | From | New Democratic Party | To | Debating the Environment Act, 3331 |
| Message | Put jobs before salamanders. |
| Date | 03:09:39, July 10, 2012 CET | From | Zardio Federisma Partio | To | Debating the Environment Act, 3331 |
| Message | There is a limit and balance to be maintained between environmental protection and economic development. This disrupts this balance. |
| Date | 04:00:41, July 10, 2012 CET | From | New Democratic Party | To | Debating the Environment Act, 3331 |
| Message | Most countries have restrictions. One country (us) dropping these restrictions won't really hurt the environment, but it would be good for our economy. |
| Date | 18:16:45, July 10, 2012 CET | From | Zardio Federisma Partio | To | Debating the Environment Act, 3331 |
| Message | In this case the CRP values putting limited protections on the environment to preserve it for later generations. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes |
Total Seats: 402 | |
| no |
Total Seats: 348 | |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "[In the West] unpopular ideas can be silenced, and inconvenient facts kept dark, without any need for an official ban." - George Orwell |