Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 02:48:29
Server time: 09:11:30, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Treaty Withdrawl Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party of United Citizens

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3385

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:32:45, October 22, 2012 CET
From Party of United Citizens
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawl Act
MessageThese treaties restrict the law of placing protectional tariffs, which the PoUC would like to set in place to encourage buying homemade products and grow the economy.

Date02:38:21, October 22, 2012 CET
From Gilde Mercantile Solentia
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawl Act
MessageThe PoP supports the withdrawal. Solentia should stand on its own and need not the help of others.

Date12:46:51, October 22, 2012 CET
From Grand Liberal Party
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawl Act
MessageThese measures will damage Solentian business. These agreements promote fere trade and no tariffs between member nations on both sides- why put Solentian companies at a disadvantage?

Date21:23:52, October 22, 2012 CET
From Party of United Citizens
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawl Act
MessageThat's not true at all. Protectionist tariffs make Solentian-made goods more appealing to buy due to their lower price, thus stimulating economic growth.

Date23:14:27, October 22, 2012 CET
From Grand Liberal Party
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawl Act
MessageYour argument is only valid for the domestic economy- in order to grow economically we need to grow our exports and these policies will make us uncompetitive internationally.

Date01:28:45, October 23, 2012 CET
From Party of United Citizens
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawl Act
MessageWe can still have agreements to withhold tariffs for certain allies of ours, but we want to make the Solentian goods more appealing than foreign goods.

Date02:22:14, October 23, 2012 CET
From Gilde Mercantile Solentia
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawl Act
MessageThe nationalist and patriots of Solentia shall rejoice at this bill

Date11:32:38, October 23, 2012 CET
From Grand Liberal Party
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawl Act
MessageThe TRUE patriots of Solentia embrace our Terran neighbours in a spirit of openness and understanding- not small minded protectionism

Date15:22:04, October 23, 2012 CET
From Gilde Mercantile Solentia
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawl Act
MessageWe do embrace them but we should at least be a little selfish for our country.

Date07:39:25, October 24, 2012 CET
From Federal Independent Party
ToDebating the Treaty Withdrawl Act
MessageWe applaud the PUC and PoP for aiding and abetting the promulgation of Solentian sovereignty, a concept and custom that had become foreign during years of Liberal unitarianism.

FIP Senate Minority Leader Don Davine

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 254

no
  

Total Seats: 150

abstain
 

Total Seats: 21


Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "We can only protect liberty by making it relevant to the modern world." - Tony Blair

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61