We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Seperation of Police and Military Act 3385
Details
Submitted by[?]: Grand Liberal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3386
Description[?]:
| Restoring the seperation between these functions |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:25:10, October 25, 2012 CET | From |  United Labor Party of Solentia | To | Debating the Seperation of Police and Military Act 3385 |
| Message | We aren't demanding military to show up at protest and everything, we are just demanding them to show up when there is a shootout and such. That is what serious emergencies mean. |
| Date | 03:16:46, October 26, 2012 CET | From | Gilde Mercantile Solentia | To | Debating the Seperation of Police and Military Act 3385 |
| Message | Totally with the ULP |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 208 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 217 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time. |
| Random quote: "An "acceptable" level of unemployment means that the government economist to whom it is acceptable still has a job." - Author Unknown |