We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Weapon De-Militarization Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4007
Description[?]:
| The purpose of this bill is to reduce the amount of guns and other weapons from the public sphere. More guns will statistically lead to more accidents and more deaths. Let us more strictly regulate guns. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, but these may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Current: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Proposed: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:02:57, April 01, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Weapon De-Militarization Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We do not share your belief in dis-arming Law Enforcement. We could have supported this bill otherwise. Senator Bradley Lexington Deputy Leader of the Liberal Party |
| Date | 20:04:50, April 01, 2016 CET | From | Free Socialist Coalition | To | Debating the Weapon De-Militarization Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, So do the Liberals believe that the police should have unlimited powers over the common Hutorian? We all know that power over extended periods leads to corruption. Average people around allowed guns, neither should the police. Andrew Smith GUP Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 160 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 195 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood." - Universal Declaration of Human Rights |