We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Weapon De-Militarization Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4007
Description[?]:
| The purpose of this bill is to reduce the amount of guns and other weapons from the public sphere. More guns will statistically lead to more accidents and more deaths. Let us more strictly regulate guns. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, but these may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Current: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Proposed: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:02:57, April 01, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Weapon De-Militarization Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We do not share your belief in dis-arming Law Enforcement. We could have supported this bill otherwise. Senator Bradley Lexington Deputy Leader of the Liberal Party |
| Date | 20:04:50, April 01, 2016 CET | From | Free Socialist Coalition | To | Debating the Weapon De-Militarization Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, So do the Liberals believe that the police should have unlimited powers over the common Hutorian? We all know that power over extended periods leads to corruption. Average people around allowed guns, neither should the police. Andrew Smith GUP Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 160 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 195 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
| Random quote: "If you cannot convince a fascist, acquaint his head with the pavement." - Leon Trotsky |