We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: OOC/RP: Hutorian 5th Circuit of Appeals G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Heritage Party of Hutori
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4049
Description[?]:
| G. McCreight v. The Rocc-Cola Corporation Appeal The Honorable Judge Donald Hanna Presiding Original Trial: (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=474450) Plaintiff: Gwen McCreight, Cheyne McCreight Legal Counsel: Chloe Mitchell The plaintiff alleges that the Rocc-Cola Corporation was in breach of contract when they liquidated her shares of the company. Defendant: The Rocc-Cola Corporation, Clinton L. Wayne Legal Counsel: Adam McLaughlin, Nathan Callahan The defense contends that Ms. McCreight willingly withdrew from the corporation allowing them to liquidate her share in the company consistent with Hutorian law. Evidence: Exhibit A: Rocc-Cola International Terran Bank Statement Exhibit B: Correspondence between Mr. Wayne and Ms. McCreight Exhibit C: Additional correspondence between Mr. Wayne and Ms. McCreight OOC: Judge Donald Hanna: Apulia-3 Gwen McCreight: toro42 Clinton Wayne: MackinAintEasy Adam McLaughlin: RIS Nathan Callahan: Vesica5 Anna Steuart: Vesica5 Chloe Mitchell: toro42 Cheyne McCreight: toro42 Kathy Bishop: RIS |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 06:37:46, June 16, 2016 CET | From | National Monarchist Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian 5th Circuit of Appeals G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | Ladies and Gentleman of the Court, Has the petitioner of the appeal prepared his appellate brief? - Judge Donald Hanna Hutorian 6th Circuit Court of Appeals |
| Date | 20:25:19, June 16, 2016 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian 5th Circuit of Appeals G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | Your honor, We have prepared the appellate brief. Adam McLaughlin Senior Vice President of Legal Affairs Rocc-Cola Corporation |
| Date | 20:26:00, June 16, 2016 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian 5th Circuit of Appeals G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF HUTORI Case No. APC05-382 CLINTON WAYNE and ROCC-COLA CORPORATION Petitioner, vs. GWEN MCCREIGHT, Respondents. ______________________________________________________________ ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE HUTORIAN COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH DISTRICT CASE NOS. 3A113-5306, 3A11-5495 and 3A12-644 PREFACE In this Brief, the Petitioner CLINTON WAYNE will be referred to as WAYNE. The Petitioner ROCC-COLA CORPORATION will be referred to as ROCC-COLA. The Respondent GWEN MCCREIGHT will be referred to as MCCREIGHT. ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW The previous court ruling does not accurately take into account Hutorian Industry & Trade Regulation Article 32 Subsection A, MCCREIGHT willing withdrawal from ROCC-COLA or the lack of communication from MCCREIGHT to WAYNE. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS This appeal arises from the post-judgement ruling by the trial court on the issue of whether or not WAYNE was in compliance or in breach of Hutorian contractual law. The underlying litigation arose from WAYNE and ROCC-COLA liquidating the shares formerly owned by MCCREIGHT. The defense argued that Hutorian Industry & Trade Regulation Article 32 Subsection A which states: “After the willful withdrawal from a company, corporation or financial endeavor it is the duty of the entity withdrawing to either liquidate their equity in said endeavor or to provide concrete intentions for said equity. If the entity withdrawing fails to do so within a period of two years then the corporation, company or individual remaining in the endeavor can seize the remaining equity to ensure for the continued successful operation of the endeavor.” Allowed for the seizure and liquidation of MCCREIGHT’s shares. The Defense argued that concrete intentions were not provided in Exhibit B which was delivered before the two years required had passed, that confirmation of intention was never sent and that an inquiry into the status of the account (Exhibit C)was not sent until four years after the willing withdrawal. |
| Date | 18:29:09, June 17, 2016 CET | From | National Monarchist Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian 5th Circuit of Appeals G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | "Thank you Mr. McLaughlin. Does the respondent have his brief prepared?" |
| Date | 18:05:16, June 18, 2016 CET | From |  La Gauche/Les Verts (LV) | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian 5th Circuit of Appeals G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | OOC: Sorry for the wait -- computer problems. |
| Date | 21:52:14, June 20, 2016 CET | From | La Gauche/Les Verts (LV) | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian 5th Circuit of Appeals G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | Your honor, Upon entry to the Rocc Cola Group, the McCreight family purchased a 4% share in the Group. That amount was soon increased to 20%, on which they spent tens of billions of LOD. Multiple decades later, the McCreights left the Rocc Cola Group and immediately requested to keep their shares. Monsieur Wayne replied that that was possible. The next time they checked the share ownership, their share was gone. The plaintiffs hereby make their case that the Rocc Cola Group unlawfully (by company law) confiscated their share. Chief Justice Chloe Mitchell Legal Counsel the the McCreights |
| Date | 21:37:32, June 22, 2016 CET | From | La Gauche/Les Verts (LV) | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian 5th Circuit of Appeals G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | OOC: Is this trial still going? It's been two days, so I'm not sure. |
| Date | 23:49:08, June 23, 2016 CET | From | National Monarchist Party of Hutori | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian 5th Circuit of Appeals G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | "Ladies and gentlemen of the court, Having reviewed both the petitioner and respondent's briefs, and the legal code put forward by the land of Hutori, I hereby overturn the decision handed down by the trial court. Any damages paid should be returned. This court does not believe that there is sufficient evidence to prove breach of contract by Mr. Wayne. The Hon. Justice Gordon Robertson acted incorrectly when ordering a private citizen to stand down as executive, thus, in this court's opinion, further nullifying the decision." |
| Date | 00:14:18, June 24, 2016 CET | From | La Gauche/Les Verts (LV) | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Hutorian 5th Circuit of Appeals G. McCreight v. Rocc-Cola Corp. |
| Message | We appeal. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 436 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 133 |
| Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy". |
| Random quote: "Hence it comes about that all armed Prophets have been victorious, and all unarmed Prophets have been destroyed." - Niccolo Machiavelli |