Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:40:24
Server time: 19:19:35, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AR Drax | ChevaldelaMer | Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 4190

Details

Submitted by[?]: Labour Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 4191

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:22:27, April 04, 2017 CET
FromUnited Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4190
Message"This is an illegal proposal. The BRRP is the only party that can propose a cabinet at the moment, they have made their first one, now they will propose their second one soon."

-Jess Young, UPB Congressional Leader, MC.

Date12:26:34, April 04, 2017 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4190
Message"The UPB's comment is completely untrue as it is legal for any party to propse a cabinet, as was voted for against the UPB who voted for a cabniet proposal to only be allowed by the President, and if the UPB does need more evidence i suggest they look at the law: The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.

Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.

Alternatives:
Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Only the largest party can propose a cabinet."

-Brian Proctor, Vice President.

Date15:35:33, April 04, 2017 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4190
MessagePlease look at this RP law: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=509506

Date15:36:23, April 04, 2017 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4190
MessageI appointed you as Vice President to serve the country, not to make mistakes regarding government formation

Date16:31:24, April 04, 2017 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4190
MessageI accept that we made a mistake, and would however like to point out with the utmost respect that so did the BRRP as it states that " The largest party will have the first opportunity to propose a government." and the BRRP is the joint seond largest party, i think its safe to say mistakes have been made on either side and we should all accept that we where in the wrong and move on."

Date17:13:35, April 04, 2017 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4190
MessageIt also allows the party controlling Head of State to form a government

Date17:35:15, April 04, 2017 CET
FromRepublican Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4190
MessageThe BRRP did not make a mistake. They are the only party allowed to propose a cabinet for now, as they are Head of State as President. If their proposed cabinets fail three times, I am then allowed to propose the cabinet as largest party in the nation.

Since we are in a Presidential system currently, the Labour Party is *never* allowed to propose a cabinet as third largest party. We would go to an early election in the case that the BRRP's cabinets fails three times and the largest party's cabinets (mine) fails once, I believe. The number of times that a cabinet proposed by the largest party can fail is ambiguous, so I am assuming once.

This is covered in Section 2 of the Government Procedure Act.
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=509506

Date17:36:44, April 04, 2017 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4190
MessageYou have two chances to propose a cabinet.

Date17:44:59, April 04, 2017 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 4190
MessageOur party was reading the parlimentary rules sorry.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
           

    Total Seats: 691

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 59


    Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left.

    Random quote: "Since when did you care about women?" - Faith Chiang, former Gaduri politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 70