Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 02:18:23
Server time: 13:41:36, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): rezins | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Blue Crown Economic Reform, 4227

Details

Submitted by[?]: Centrist Alliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 4229

Description[?]:

Proposed by Rebecca Rees (CA-BC Speaker and Finance Minister)

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:06:08, June 17, 2017 CET
From Centrist Alliance
ToDebating the Blue Crown Economic Reform, 4227
MessageMr Speaker,

Can we have the opinions of other parties regarding our proposal? We hope through this proposal we can please both right and left.

Rebecca Rees
CA-BC Speaker

Date22:31:32, June 17, 2017 CET
FromWhite Rose
ToDebating the Blue Crown Economic Reform, 4227
MessageMr Speaker,

We cannot support 4, 5, 6 and 7.

Marquis Dale Weston
Leader of the RCP

Date23:40:03, June 17, 2017 CET
From Centrist Alliance
ToDebating the Blue Crown Economic Reform, 4227
MessageMr Speaker,

We ask the Royal Conservatives to explain why this is the case.

Rebecca Rees
CA-BC Speaker

Date23:51:36, June 17, 2017 CET
FromWhite Rose
ToDebating the Blue Crown Economic Reform, 4227
MessageMr Speaker,

Of course.

Article 4 would interfere in the free market. If a corporation, company or body can create, sustain and supply a monopoly, so be it.

Article 5 would open ourselves to rampant strike action. Why should i get to strike because my mate gets paid less and we are in close Trade Unions. I should only stike about my own pay and conditions, I can support my mate without hurting my own business, especially since businesses can fire people who go on strike.

Article 6 is about democracy. A trade union should be able to muster and get the support of at least half its total membership before taking union wide action.

Article 7 believes DWC's are politically motivated and proven ineffective in the business world, especially when corporations paying our low corporation tax can provide, sustain and expand so much more.

And these are our reasons for wanting to protect the country. If they removed these articles, the bill would have RCP support... you could even present a second bill with these article attached for a seperate vote, which we will oppose but the House may decide otherwise.

Marquis Dale Weston
Leader of the RCP

Date08:45:50, June 18, 2017 CET
From Centrist Alliance
ToDebating the Blue Crown Economic Reform, 4227
MessageMr Speaker,

Article 4 prevents the free market system from being controlled and tampered with - it is necessary for the sustainability of the free market ststem.

Article 5 allows workers to go out on strike in solidarity with the working conditions of others - something the Holy Luthori Church would support.

Article 6 - if turnout in Luthori reached below 50% would it not be undemocratic to declare the election invalid and for the previous parties to continue to govern?

Article 7- if people wish to form a DWC then they should not be blocked from doing so.

Rebecca Rees
CA-BC Speaker


Date01:07:40, June 19, 2017 CET
FromWhite Rose
ToDebating the Blue Crown Economic Reform, 4227
MessageMr Speaker,

Article 4 would allow the Government to control and tamper with the free market.

Article 5 would not gain the support of the Church in our view, because it would open the floodgates to crippling strikes, job losses and a collapse in services, especially essential public services.

Article 6 is a different matter, if the Capitalist Alliance want to discuss turnout thresholds in elections, we are willing. But on strikes, an action that can lead to job losses should be supported by membership. If it is that important, surely the members will vote.

Article 7, of course they should be, to protect the economy, jobs and services.

Marquis Dale Weston
Leader of the RCP

Date20:07:45, June 19, 2017 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Blue Crown Economic Reform, 4227
MessageMr Speaker,
Many of the Articles in this bill are highly progressive and the Federation supports them, mainly the ones involved in the breaking of monopolies and the legalisation of Democratic Worker's councils. However, we cannot support child labour, EVER, under any circumstances, regardless of the bribes.

The Masked Man,
Delegate Leader of the Anarchist Federation

Date20:33:16, June 19, 2017 CET
FromPatriots Party
ToDebating the Blue Crown Economic Reform, 4227
MessageMr Speaker,
We will not support any change to our trade union laws.

Date21:38:02, June 19, 2017 CET
From Centrist Alliance
ToDebating the Blue Crown Economic Reform, 4227
MessageMr Speaker,

You'd much rather have children who are not academically inclined sit around at home when they could be productively contributing to society? Surely this is not very 'anarchistic'

Rebecca Rees
CA-BC Speaker

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 118

no
    

Total Seats: 195

abstain
  

Total Seats: 65


Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda.

Random quote: "Abolition of a woman's right to abortion, when and if she wants it, amounts to compulsory maternity: a form of rape by the State." - Edward Abbey

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 95