We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Re-affirmation of Arms Act 4228
Details
Submitted by[?]: White Rose
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4228
Description[?]:
| An Act to re-affirm the House's commitment to the Luthorian military arms and rights |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Current: The nation shall never develop, purchase or store biological or chemical weaponry.
Proposed: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is allowed.
Current: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Proposed: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:16:42, June 18, 2017 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Re-affirmation of Arms Act 4228 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, This Act is designed to give the House a choice again. Support these arms by voting no, or support the end of these arms for our military by voting yes. The RCP supports our military and our means to win wars, so will vote NO. James Stinson Deputy Leader of the RCP |
| Date | 02:13:44, June 19, 2017 CET | From | Lightbulb Party | To | Debating the Re-affirmation of Arms Act 4228 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, Our country's people demand a strong military, so we cannot support this bill. Nerp - Lightbulb Poobah |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 43 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 270 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 65 |
| Random fact: Moderation reserves the discretion to declare RP laws invalid if the players supporting them are doing so in an excessively confrontational way. |
| Random quote: “Can anyone imagine a more perverse idea than forcing faithful Hosians like me to give away my money to enable irresponsible teenage girls to kill off their children because they were too drunk to use a damn condom?" - Dr. Francesca dos Santos, former Dranian politician |