We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Land Mines Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Liberal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4250
Description[?]:
| Use of land mines is a military policy related to the past, and also is ineffective, expensive and, most of all, dangerous for our country because a lot of mines could be unexploded and buried for years and this may invole extremely serious damage to Hutorian people or Death. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is allowed but restricted.
Current: The use of land mines is allowed but restricted.
Proposed: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:16:00, July 31, 2017 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Land Mines Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The SLP is quite misinformed, modern landmines are only used as a defensive measure something which they excel at and they are equipped with tags that allow them to be quickly recovered by allied forces. Furthermore, it is standard Hutorian military procedure to remove landmines at the end of a conflict. So all the points raised by the SLP are thoroughly invalid. Senator Wyatt McLaughlin (F-AD) Federalist Senate Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 148 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 404 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 53 |
| Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
| Random quote: "An "acceptable" level of unemployment means that the government economist to whom it is acceptable still has a job." - Author Unknown |