We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defence Industries Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4250
Description[?]:
| Since our army is not private, our party think that the government should be more involve on defence industries than private ones. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned but subsidised by the state.
Current: Defence industries are privately owned but subsidised by the state.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:18:18, July 31, 2017 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Defence Industries Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, What policy does this implement? There are no guidelines or instructions there is no reference to the current governing law. Only, "We think the government should have more say." That is pure ridiculousness how can anyone vote for something so vague and potentially damaging? Senator Wyatt McLaughlin (F-AD) Federalist Senate Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 345 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 207 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 53 |
| Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
| Random quote: "Politics is not a bad profession. If you succeed there are many rewards, if you disgrace yourself, you can always write a book." - Ronald Reagan |