We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Blue One Elk Flag Proposal
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Liberal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4287
Description[?]:
| For the arguments exposed by different parties in the National Flag Committee http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=540439, we propose the OPTION 2 as the next National Flag of the Federal Republic of Likatonia: https://i.imgur.com/h7VExOP.png |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The national flag (URL).
Old value:: https://i.imgur.com/Qw9XHb6.png
Current: https://i.imgur.com/HlPbxHI.jpeg
Proposed: https://i.imgur.com/h7VExOP.png
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:47:09, October 13, 2017 CET | From | Republican Centrist Alliance | To | Debating the Blue One Elk Flag Proposal |
| Message | We just changed our flag two times already enough is enough. Wait at the very least a 100 years before changing it again. |
| Date | 16:53:33, October 13, 2017 CET | From | Democratic Technocracy Directive | To | Debating the Blue One Elk Flag Proposal |
| Message | It was changed from the the green version to the blue without such a restriction; what difference is there in that and to this one? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 118 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 268 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 39 |
| Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting. |
| Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |