We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of April 4292
Details
Submitted by[?]: Fatherland Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4292
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Fatherland Front
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Social Liberal Centre Party (SLCP)
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Social Liberal Centre Party (SLCP)
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Fatherland Front
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Social Liberal Centre Party (SLCP)
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:36:10, October 24, 2017 CET | From | Fatherland Front | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of April 4292 |
| Message | I need to have foreign affairs and defense to respond to rp and stuff if you don't. OOC: Since I am the most active player like...always I get handed the defense and foreign affairs so I can respond to stuff in the forums for Malivia. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 76 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 11 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 108 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |