We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Law of limit proposal
Details
Submitted by[?]: United We Can
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4382
Description[?]:
| In this parliament, some time ago it was debated to minimize the number of representatives of this chamber and there were parties that used parliamentary activity as an excuse for their members to continue charging for doing nothing. Well, now we ask that you not be hypocrites and that you vote in favor of working to the max in our parliament to create a better Malivia. In addition, in times of "Freedom", this same proposal was voted and because of the abstention of "Freedom" it did not go ahead, it only voted against MRP, and FF, WoC, MORENA and the Progressive League, voted in favor of this proposal. Let's not be hypocrites, please. We ask the political groups that are positioned against this bill to explain why they do it. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 26
Current: 50
Proposed: 35
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:53:26, April 22, 2018 CET | From | United We Can | To | Debating the Law of limit proposal |
| Message | In this parliament, some time ago it was debated to minimize the number of representatives of this chamber and there were parties that used parliamentary activity as an excuse for their members to continue charging for doing nothing. Well, now we ask that you not be hypocrites and that you vote in favor of working to the max in our parliament to create a better Malivia. In addition, in times of "Freedom", this same proposal was voted and because of the abstention of "Freedom" it did not go ahead, it only voted against MRP, and FF, WoC, MORENA and the Progressive League, voted in favor of this proposal. Let's not be hypocrites, please. We ask the political groups that are positioned against this bill to explain why they do it. |
| Date | 12:36:19, April 23, 2018 CET | From | Fatherland Front | To | Debating the Law of limit proposal |
| Message | ooc: ? Em? Where is the proposal limiting the representatives? |
| Date | 18:08:06, April 23, 2018 CET | From | Hosian National Party | To | Debating the Law of limit proposal |
| Message | I don't tthink we need to propose that many quotas. After all, every law that our party proposes is rejected; we feel powerless. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 271 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 92 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 137 |
| Random fact: The Real-Life Equivalents Index is a valuable resource for finding out the in-game equivalents of real-life cultures, languages, religions, people and places: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6731 |
| Random quote: "Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names the streets after them." - Bill Vaughn |