We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: LP-145: Campaign Finance Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: 莲花党 (Lotus Party) 🌸
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4385
Description[?]:
| - |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Public financing of political campaigns
Old value:: All candidates receive public funds but are not allowed to accept donations.
Current: The government decides which candidates can receive public funds on a case-by-case basis.
Proposed: All candidates receive public funds, and can still accept donations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:00:26, April 27, 2018 CET | From | 匡民會 Renewal 🤚 | To | Debating the LP-145: Campaign Finance Reform Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, If we allow the Caizu and clans to donate money to politicians, this house shall fall in the fires of peoples discontent. We the people must not be betrayed. Chen Tianwei Republican League |
| Date | 22:54:25, April 27, 2018 CET | From | 国家联盟 (National Alliance) 📣 | To | Debating the LP-145: Campaign Finance Reform Act |
| Message | We must today join the opposition in opposing this proposal. Our politicians should treat all constituents equally. There should be no money is politics to corrupt our minds and make us focus on anything other than improving our nation for all. Qiao Xinyi Minister of Internal Affairs Leader of the Nationalist Alliance |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 271 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 397 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." - Jean Chretien (describing the level of proof about weapons of mass destruction that Canada required to join the Iraq War) |