Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 01:39:11
Server time: 02:20:48, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Withdraw from Malivia-Dundorf Agreement

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Conservative Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 4385

Description[?]:

This treaty is useless and we are allying ourselves with Communist Dictators!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:47:02, April 28, 2018 CET
FromProgressive League
ToDebating the Withdraw from Malivia-Dundorf Agreement
MessageI would like to ask, what are your arguments regarding withdrawal.

Date18:27:56, April 28, 2018 CET
FromNational Conservative Party
ToDebating the Withdraw from Malivia-Dundorf Agreement
MessageI don’t want to trade with these types of nations!

OOC: Would you trade with North Korea 2017 or put economic sanctions on them?

Date21:12:45, April 28, 2018 CET
FromNationale Arbeiterpartei-Volksfront
ToDebating the Withdraw from Malivia-Dundorf Agreement
MessageGood day, ladies and gentleman of this chamber. My name is Maria Schässer, and I have served as Chairwoman of the Council of Ministers of Dundorf since 4382. I am here today to speak on behalf of my country in telling you that Dundorf is not a "communist dictatorship," as the gentleman has claimed. We are, in fact, a healthy and vibrant republic. Every three years Dundorfians go out and vote for their leader, and they have options - we are not a one party state. These elections are free and fair, with more than 60% participation. Dundorf is not a dictatorship, and if this resolution should pass, Malivia would lose a good ally. I hope you take this into consideration when you go to vote.

Sincerely,
Maria Schässer
Chairwoman of the Council of Ministers of Dundorf

Date21:44:59, April 28, 2018 CET
FromNational Conservative Party
ToDebating the Withdraw from Malivia-Dundorf Agreement
MessageThis bill will pass because we have our Centrist ally and our Right-wing Democratic Party. The people in Dundorf have a choice, they either vote for you or another party. You and that other party is Communist! Your previous Coalition ally the KPD even wanted paramilitaries to be LEGAL, and ban all parties that weren’t far-left. I’ve been to your nation and met with AfD and DPD leaders who were forced to defend themselves so that they can use their donations to protect there parties from destruction. This is a bill for the greater good and I will empower economic sanctions and lower your economic system. No wonder parties are not signing up in Dundorf to be registered... Good day to you Madame Commie.

Yours Faithfully,
Gustav Hellmann, Prime Minister of Malivia

Date22:34:44, April 28, 2018 CET
FromProgressive League
ToDebating the Withdraw from Malivia-Dundorf Agreement
MessageWell, I looked after the laws of Dundorf.
They have some authoritian laws what would be unacceptable for us in Malivia, but it is their own national right to adjust those laws, so it would be not a problem regarding an alliance.
But.
The laws regarding nuclear and biological weapons are really concerning. It alows to use nuclear and biological weapons for any reason. This is really not a bright view.
Personally, I think the best aim would be to minimize nuclear weapons worldwide, and ban biological weapons totally.
And political palette/position in Dundorf does not give a gurantee for that the nuclear and biological weapons are "used" with responsibility. Far - right groups may have too much influence in the country.

So, because of our worries of nukes, and bioweapons, we support the withdrawal.



Date22:35:47, April 28, 2018 CET
FromProgressive League
ToDebating the Withdraw from Malivia-Dundorf Agreement
Message(( Far- left groups *))

Date22:37:16, April 28, 2018 CET
FromNational Conservative Party
ToDebating the Withdraw from Malivia-Dundorf Agreement
MessageI support it because they are authoritarian.

Date13:39:04, April 29, 2018 CET
FromProgressive League
ToDebating the Withdraw from Malivia-Dundorf Agreement
MessageDundorfians adjusted their positions on nuclear and biological weapon, and that is a valuable guesture, a step toward the good way.

Date15:34:16, April 29, 2018 CET
FromNational Conservative Party
ToDebating the Withdraw from Malivia-Dundorf Agreement
MessageMate they are not Democratic.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 260

no
    

Total Seats: 219

abstain
  

Total Seats: 21


Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass.

Random quote: "Conservatism, however, is too often a welcome excuse for lazy minds, loath to adapt themselves to fast changing conditions." - Sigmund Freud

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55