Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 03:30:31
Server time: 16:29:28, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): ADM Drax | HopesFor | Klexi | SocDemDundorfian | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Regulate And Reclaim Our Nation

Details

Submitted by[?]: Ecosocialist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 4402

Description[?]:

Mr. Speaker,

The EP proposes to regulate all of our major industries, and wants to take back control over our country. For too long, the priority of the important industries - where people's lifes depend on - has been making money instead of doing good things for the citizens of our glorious nation. Time for the government to let our country resurrect from capitalism. Vote yes.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:40:11, May 30, 2018 CET
FromProgressive Socialist Party
ToDebating the Regulate And Reclaim Our Nation
MessageMr. Speaker,

First I want to applaud the Ecosocialist party for taking steps that will improve our society in numerous ways. However, we do have some critical remarks. Article 3 concerning gated communities is something we do not support. We would rather not see any gated communities, but if they are to be allowed, it should not be a job the government should make its hands filthy with. Furthermore, as we are pacifists, we do not believe in Article 4 concerning the defense industry, however, the latter article will not determine our support of it. If the Ecosocialists are willing to remove article 3 concerning gated communities, we are willing to support this bill.

Leon Vance
Economy & Finance spokesperson
PSP

Date15:50:17, May 30, 2018 CET
FromLiberal Progressives
ToDebating the Regulate And Reclaim Our Nation
MessageMr. Speaker,

The Liberal Progressives could not disagree more about every single aspect of this bill. It was recently said to us not to 'fix something that is not broken' yet that is exactly what this bill would try and do. It is an immense power grab for the government that we simply cannot afford. The central government should not get more responsibilities, but fewer. Furthermore, the Liberal Progressives are vehemently opposed to the very concept of gated communities and would spur other parties not to support this bill.

Bill Murray,
Leader of the Liberal Progressives

Date16:40:10, May 30, 2018 CET
FromParty For Liberation of the People
ToDebating the Regulate And Reclaim Our Nation
MessageMr Speaker,

This bill is greatly opposed in our party. This is against all liberation principles we have.

Marco Rutta
head of PLP

Date16:42:21, May 30, 2018 CET
FromEcosocialist Party
ToDebating the Regulate And Reclaim Our Nation
MessageMr. Speaker,

We agree with our colleagues of the PSP and will remove article 3. Concerning the other reactions: predictive liberal blah-blah.

Joan d'Angel
Ecosocialist Party Leader

Date17:10:41, May 30, 2018 CET
FromLodamun Labour Party
ToDebating the Regulate And Reclaim Our Nation
MessageMr. Speaker,

The LLP supports the bill. From the beginning of our party the LLP has proposed to expand the roles of the government. The Ecosocialists will have the full support of the LLP for this bill.

Lars Isaacson,
Leader of the LLP

Date20:10:26, May 30, 2018 CET
FromGrand Nationalist Fraction
ToDebating the Regulate And Reclaim Our Nation
MessageMr. Speaker,

LNC disagrees on the stance on industry. The State should not own all industry.

Mikoyan Gorky
MP for LNC

Date05:26:59, May 31, 2018 CET
FromLodamese Democratic Progressive Party
ToDebating the Regulate And Reclaim Our Nation
MessageMr. Speaker,

The New Green Party of Lodamun agrees with the Liberal Party in that our current system is working out fine. We don't feel the need to completely abolish private industry, especially since that could put a significant strain on our economy. We won't support this proposal.

Trevor Takon,
NGPoL MP

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 135

no
  

Total Seats: 218

abstain
   

Total Seats: 246


Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law.

Random quote: "Zardugal. . . very successfully almost managed to implement democracy on a global scale, a millennia ago. With a seat in the Security Council we can do it again." - Phoebe Ĥoniato, former Zardic politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 98