Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 00:08:58
Server time: 15:51:01, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: GG-GL-SfG-GPA Cabinet Proposal of April 4407: Government of Progress

Details

Submitted by[?]: Go Gaduridos! [PAG]

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 4407

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:07:02, June 12, 2018 CET
FromGaduridos Communist Party
ToDebating the GG-GL-SfG-GPA Cabinet Proposal of April 4407: Government of Progress
MessageDespite not being considered for this cabinet, a fact that the GCP doesn't take lightly, our Party will vote yes. We will honor our commitments to the Progressive Alliance, in order to secure a better future for the people of Gaduridos.

-Angelo Cunhal, head of Party-to-Party relations and Parliamentary Affairs

Date04:26:53, June 12, 2018 CET
FromProgressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the GG-GL-SfG-GPA Cabinet Proposal of April 4407: Government of Progress
MessageLabour is getting shafted by this. Second largest party in the coalition gets locked out of all three of the most powerful positions (HoG, Foreign Affairs, Finance)? We're surprised they're willing to accept such a configuration.

Date04:38:26, June 12, 2018 CET
FromGaduridos Labour [PAG]
ToDebating the GG-GL-SfG-GPA Cabinet Proposal of April 4407: Government of Progress
MessageAt this point, the current cabinet is not only unsustainable, but is being lead by a party completely unsuitable to good government or decency. Labour has on several occasions now accepted Government that does not recognise our contribution completely, but have done so for the good of the nation.

We will continue to reflect on this over coming years however will always put country first.

Date05:00:59, June 12, 2018 CET
FromProgressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the GG-GL-SfG-GPA Cabinet Proposal of April 4407: Government of Progress
MessageWe do admire Labour's willingness to put country ahead of party, and we agree that the current Cabinet is not a sustainable option for our country.

We just wanted to make sure the parties that produced and agreed to this proposal are aware that this is not a terribly fair configuration based upon the outcome of the last elections.

Date07:08:17, June 12, 2018 CET
FromGo Gaduridos! [PAG]
ToDebating the GG-GL-SfG-GPA Cabinet Proposal of April 4407: Government of Progress
MessageTo the GCP: We did not include you because we did not want to have too many parties in the coalition, the less parties the less chances of the government collapsing due to infighting.

And to the PCP: These negotiations were very difficult, but in the end all parties got most of the ministries they wished for, including labour.



Labour wanted rhe

Date15:36:48, June 12, 2018 CET
FromGaduridos Communist Party
ToDebating the GG-GL-SfG-GPA Cabinet Proposal of April 4407: Government of Progress
MessageWe find amusing the Conservatives' silly attempts to destabilize this cabinet proposal

Date18:26:35, June 12, 2018 CET
FromProgressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the GG-GL-SfG-GPA Cabinet Proposal of April 4407: Government of Progress
MessageWe most sincerely apologize to the communists for caring about the will of voters and the composition of our country's government.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 191

no
    

Total Seats: 93

abstain
 

Total Seats: 41


Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer.

Random quote: "Politics is too serious a matter to be left to the politicians." - Charles de Gaulle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68