Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 02:13:30
Server time: 21:46:29, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): hexaus18 | hexaus19 | JourneyJak | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: GG-GL-GPA-GCP Cabinet Proposal of August 4408: Government of Progress II

Details

Submitted by[?]: Go Gaduridos! [PAG]

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 4409

Description[?]:

SfG has decided to leave the current government because they think that their poor performance in the latest elections were a result of people being unhappy with their way of governing.
We respect SfG's Decision and have assembled a new cabinet where the GCP would take over the ministries of foreign affairs and finance from SfG and the GPA the ministry of science and technology.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:40:47, June 14, 2018 CET
FromGreen Progressive Alliance [PAG]
ToDebating the GG-GL-GPA-GCP Cabinet Proposal of August 4408: Government of Progress II
MessageMr. President,

We firmly believe in progressive politics. However, we also recognise that the Gaduridos voters have decided to split votes between the progressive and the conservative parties. We understand that many parties in this nation want to have the chance to rule. We appreciate that GG has once again asked us to be part of this new government. However, we feel that it would be a better reflection of the voting outcome if GG and Labour start negotiations with PCP and SCP to form a broad middle government. We do see that voters gave us as the GPA 5 more seats than the previous elections, but we feel that we would do Gaduridos an injustice if we wouldn't allow the PCP as the largest single winner of the elections a place at the negotiating table.

Date21:52:19, June 14, 2018 CET
FromGaduridos Communist Party
ToDebating the GG-GL-GPA-GCP Cabinet Proposal of August 4408: Government of Progress II
MessageThe GPA seems to be a bit confused, since the PCP is not the largest single winner of the elections. It is not even the second largest winner of the elections. Nor the third. It is prepostorous that the GPA would think that the vote reflects a middle government, when there was a clear shift from voters towards the progressive wing of parliament. If the GPA denies that, they are denying the voters' will.

Date21:53:23, June 14, 2018 CET
FromGaduridos Communist Party
ToDebating the GG-GL-GPA-GCP Cabinet Proposal of August 4408: Government of Progress II
MessageHowever, we recommend that the GPA follow their reasoning, and resign from a cabinet they do not believe in.

Date00:31:21, June 15, 2018 CET
FromGaduridos Labour [PAG]
ToDebating the GG-GL-GPA-GCP Cabinet Proposal of August 4408: Government of Progress II
MessageIt is up to representatives to form a strong majority government that represents the a clear policy platform for the nation. We cannot be pulling in two directions simply to create 'jobs for the boys' across all parties. Gaduridos needs clear leadership, and confusing our goals as a nation will not achieve that.

A grand coalition is bad not only for the Government but for the ability of the opposition Conservative bloc to provide a strong a robust opposition that is in the greatest tradition of stable democracies. Having a voice outside Government proposing an alternate view is a good thing, and a democratic thing. Bringing everyone in the tent to stifle opposition and murky the waters of this Government's platform is not something that Labour will endorse.

Date07:02:58, June 15, 2018 CET
FromProgressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the GG-GL-GPA-GCP Cabinet Proposal of August 4408: Government of Progress II
MessageWhen GPA suggested that PCP was "the largest single winner of the elections," we believe they were referring to the fact that we picked up the most seats of any party, not that we won the most seats of any party.

Regardless, we're happy to negotiate. However, it seems that such negotiations are unlikely to be productive considering Labour does not wish to see a grand coalition. If the GPA is unwilling to remain in the progressive cabinet, it may be best to hold another round of elections.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 138

no
   

Total Seats: 131

abstain
  

Total Seats: 56


Random fact: Zardugal is a nation based on the old Byzantine Empire, with a modern twist and the Esperanto language. Zardugal is located on the continent of Majatra.

Random quote: "In heaven all the interesting people are missing." - Friedrich Nietzsche

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61