Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 00:05:05
Server time: 15:54:54, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Privatisation Act 4729

Details

Submitted by[?]: White Rose

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 4730

Description[?]:

An Act to privatise national services and industries

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:57:56, March 22, 2020 CET
FromSocialist Party
ToDebating the Privatisation Act 4729
MessageMr. Speaker,
We have public services that are providing very useful and necessary services free of cost.And the White Rose wants to put these services in the hands of marge multinational, large corporations, greedy capitalists that do not think about the interest of the general public. Those privatisations are brutal and maybe some people will lose their jobs.Irresponsible!

Date23:07:12, March 22, 2020 CET
FromWhite Rose
ToDebating the Privatisation Act 4729
MessageMr Speaker,

These public services will remain public services, provided by business competing with each other driving prices down. We are also not falling for lies, energy and trains are not free of charge, there merely nationalised. We will privatise them and allow for price reductions.

Date23:35:14, March 22, 2020 CET
FromLeft for Progress
ToDebating the Privatisation Act 4729
MessageDear White Rose!

We think that proposal is too radical and If this become a law that result is the Iassez-faire without regulations. That's bad. We are not radical leftists, we believe in Fair Capitalism, but this is too much for us, too. We vote "no":

Respectfully:
Xander Fletcher,
the Communication Director and the
Temporary Supreme Super-delegate of the Left for Progress.

Date09:16:51, March 23, 2020 CET
FromLuthorian Democratic Union
ToDebating the Privatisation Act 4729
MessageMr Speaker,
If there would not be article 4 we would vote yes. We will abstain now.
Clement Forstner, LB

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 78

no
    

Total Seats: 54

abstain
  

Total Seats: 18


Random fact: In Particracy players are only allowed to play as one party at a time. Want to swap nations? Inactivate your current party and make a new one! Want to return? Request Moderation to reactivate your party on the forum!

Random quote: "A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both." - Dwight D. Eisenhower

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 85