Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 01:57:16
Server time: 10:02:43, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): burgerboys | Freemarket21 | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: 5274 Immigration Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Course of Freedom (Kellins faction)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 5274

Description[?]:

The LSP believes there is a need to change our immigration policy because helping refugees is always positive for the economy, as well as our international reputation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:42:12, March 20, 2023 CET
FromCourse of Freedom (Kellins faction)
ToDebating the 5274 Immigration Act
MessageHonorable Speaker, esteemed colleagues,

I rise today in support of the proposals put forward to change the government policy concerning nationality, immigration, refugee policy, and travel by foreigners to our nation.

These proposals represent a significant shift towards a more inclusive, welcoming, and equitable society. The first proposal suggests that anyone should be able to claim nationality, which is a fundamental right that should be accessible to all individuals regardless of their origin or immigration status. Denying someone the ability to claim nationality based on arbitrary requirements is a violation of their human rights.

The second proposal advocates for a fair and just immigration policy that is based on individual applicant qualifications rather than quotas. This ensures that every individual is given a fair opportunity to be considered for immigration based on their individual merits rather than being excluded due to arbitrary quotas.

The third proposal emphasizes that all refugees should be welcomed, regardless of their reason for seeking refuge. We must remember that refugees are fleeing from dire circumstances and should not be denied aid based on their reason for leaving their homeland. It is our duty as a nation to provide a safe haven for all those who seek it, and this proposal is a step towards fulfilling that duty.

Lastly, the fourth proposal suggests that the nation should impose minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities. This proposal balances the need for security with the need for welcoming visitors to our nation.

In conclusion, I urge my colleagues to support these proposals and embrace a more inclusive and equitable society. Let us stand together in support of human rights and the principles of justice and equality. Thank you.

Sarah Limpish, MP.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 248

no
       

Total Seats: 402

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

    Random quote: "Power corrupts. Absolute power is kind of neat." - Don Reagan

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 57