We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nationalisation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Course of Freedom (Kellins faction)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 5279
Description[?]:
| We believe these sectors need to be nationalised. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned but subsidised by the state.
Current: Defence industries are privately owned but subsidised by the state.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Health care policy.
Old value:: Health care is entirely private.
Current: Health care is entirely private.
Proposed: There is a free public health care system and a small number of private clinics, which are heavily regulated to ensure they treat their patients well and provide good care.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: Only private post agencies exist, and the services they provide are regulated.
Current: Only private post agencies exist, and the services they provide are regulated.
Proposed: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:03:33, March 30, 2023 CET | From | Course of Freedom (Kellins faction) | To | Debating the Nationalisation Act |
| Message | Honorable colleagues, I rise today to speak in favor of the proposals that have been put forward, particularly those concerning the nation's defence industry, health care policy, and the government's policy concerning the post office. The proposed policy to have the state own national defence industries while still allowing for privately owned defence industries strikes a balance between ensuring national security and fostering healthy competition in the industry. By having the state own national defence industries, we can ensure that they are well-funded and well-managed, which is critical for protecting our nation. At the same time, we can allow for privately owned defence industries to exist and compete, which can drive innovation and efficiency in the sector. The proposed policy to establish a free public health care system alongside a small number of heavily regulated private clinics is a step in the right direction towards ensuring that all citizens have access to high-quality healthcare. It is essential that we have a healthcare system that is accessible to all, regardless of their financial situation. A free public healthcare system, coupled with regulated private clinics, would ensure that all citizens receive the care they need, while also promoting competition and innovation in the healthcare sector. Finally, the proposed policy to nationalize the post office agency while still allowing for private post offices to exist, subject to regulation, would help ensure that all citizens have access to reliable and affordable postal services. The nationalized post office would be responsible for providing basic postal services, such as mail delivery and post office boxes, while private post offices could provide additional services, subject to regulation. This would ensure that all citizens have access to the essential services they need while also promoting competition and innovation in the postal sector. In conclusion, I urge all of my colleagues to support these proposals, as they represent important steps towards ensuring the well-being and security of all citizens. Lila Wilson, MP. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 264 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 351 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 35 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "The proletarians of the world have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workers of all countries: unite!" - Karl Marx |