We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Beiteynuese - Luthorian Alliance Agreement
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 5364
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Beiteynuese - Luthorian Alliance Agreement. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Beiteynuese - Luthorian Alliance Agreement.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:48:26, September 16, 2023 CET | From | Liberal Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Beiteynuese - Luthorian Alliance Agreement |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, Might we inquire why the WPL opposes an alliance with Beiteynu? Are they perhaps misled by anti-Yeudi voices in their party? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 382 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 181 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 87 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Racism isn't born, folks; it's taught. I have a two-year-old son. You know what he hates? Naps! End of list." - Dennis Leary |