Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5476
Next month in: 03:43:50
Server time: 20:16:09, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Dx6743 | JWDL | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: (RP) Sir Borris Taylor accuses WPL of antiyeudism

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party (Whigs)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 5365

Description[?]:

Sir Borris Taylor accuses WPL of antiyeudism

http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=68&p=187380#p187380

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:55:08, September 18, 2023 CET
FromWorkers' Party of Luthori
ToDebating the (RP) Sir Borris Taylor accuses WPL of antiyeudism
MessageMr Speaker,

We see the smears and dirty tricks campaign from the government has started already. Shameful behaviour from a shameless government.

If the National Liberals want to know why their bill failed, they should look no further than their own CDU alliance. One third of which failed to vote in favour of it. Are the Humperdincks antiyeudi as well? Must be if they didn't vote for your treaty. And yet you are allies with them, what does that make you?

Truth is, we already have a partnership agreement with Beiteynu. http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=5097
This new treaty is all about military expansion on the continent of Majatra. I would encourage all parties to compare the differences between the current partnership agreement and the new treaty. You will see the true intention.

Jason Anderson
Member for Lorcaster North West & General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Luthori

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 375

no
 

Total Seats: 181

abstain
   

Total Seats: 94


Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with.

Random quote: "He who will not economize will have to agonize." - Confucius

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 37