We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the The Luthorian-Likatonian Alliance & Security Pact
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party (Whigs)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 5372
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the The Luthorian-Likatonian Alliance & Security Pact. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the The Luthorian-Likatonian Alliance & Security Pact.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:25:15, October 02, 2023 CET | From | Fatherland Front | To | Debating the Ratification of the The Luthorian-Likatonian Alliance & Security Pact |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, Dear colleagues, The Fatherland Front asks for an apology from the CDU for their outrageous words intending to limit our liberty of proposing bills as we please, before we can move forward and vote in favour of this treaty. Dan Penning, Secretary of State for the Home Department. |
| Date | 21:53:04, October 02, 2023 CET | From | Conservative Party (Whigs) | To | Debating the Ratification of the The Luthorian-Likatonian Alliance & Security Pact |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The Fatherland Front will not again hold us hostage in a vote for this, that should have stopped by now. Secondly, like every party here has every right to propose whatever they want. But isnt it fair to voice some concerns from the CDU? We believe the Fatherland Front is going far, however they are free to propose as they please. An appology will not be given, especially after using this vote to gain it. Sir Borris Taylor Foreign Secretary |
| Date | 10:51:18, October 03, 2023 CET | From | Fatherland Front | To | Debating the Ratification of the The Luthorian-Likatonian Alliance & Security Pact |
| Message | Mr. Taylor, Out of good will, the Fatherland Front will vote in favour of the treaty. However, after the elections, the voters will decide whether they want the Fatherland Front to gain more or less influence in the composition of our next cabinet. The people will decide. We will look closely at our electoral result. Dan Penning, Secretary of State for the Home Department. |
| Date | 13:54:39, October 03, 2023 CET | From | Workers' Party of Luthori | To | Debating the Ratification of the The Luthorian-Likatonian Alliance & Security Pact |
| Message | Mr Speaker, It's nice to see the Fatherland Front doing as they are told by their masters in the CDU. Jason Anderson Member for Lorcaster North West & General Secretary of the Workers' Party of Luthori |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 512 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 77 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "I took the initiative in creating the internet." - Al Gore |